Tomas Machac vs Felipe Meligeni Alves — Doha Aus Open Qualies Qualifying Round 2

Doha Aus Open Qualies · ATP · Qualifying Round 2
Tomas Machac
CZE
Tomas Machac
#53ATP
1866ELO
1829Hard ELO
$832kYTD
$6.8MCAREER
25 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWWLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Sunday, 10 January 2021
hard
BRA
Felipe Meligeni Alves
#711ATP
1477ELO
1422Hard ELO
28 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLWWWWL
Machac T.
6-1 7-6
Meligeni Alves F.
Machac T.
6772
Meligeni Alves F.
1640

Tomas Machac defeated Felipe Meligeni Alves 6-1 7-6 in the Doha Aus Open Qualies qualifying round 2 on hard. The result followed the form book — Tomas Machac came in ranked #53.

Key context

  • Match story: Tomas Machac came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 6–1 7–6.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Machac T.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Meligeni Alves F.

Meligeni Alves F.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Machac T.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Machac T.Meligeni Alves F.
30
Serve
—
25
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Machac T.Meligeni Alves F.
1st serve in·Slight edge
62%
67%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
54%
50%
Service points won·Even
64%
63%
Return points won·Even
38%
38%
Break points saved·Even
62%
63%
Aces / match·Slight edge
5.0
3.6
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.5
1.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Machac T.Meligeni Alves F.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
90
48
Break points saved·Slight edge
98
90
Break points won·Dominant
80
18
Deciding sets·Dominant
94
47
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
97
88

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Machac T.Meligeni Alves F.
Freshness·
—
71

Meligeni Alves F.: 6 days rest · 2 matches, 52 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Draw — qualifying

Q3
Machac T.
Torpegaard M.
6-26-1
Mmoh M.
Rinderknech A.
6-37-63
Karatsev A.[3]
Muller A.
6-26-1
Laaksonen H.[15]
Gojo B.
6-746-47-67
Alcaraz C.[21]
Dellien H.[2]
6-26-3
Coppejans K.
Dzumhur D.[7]
6-26-0
Halys Q.
Haase R.
6-36-4
Van De Zandschulp B.
Bourgue M.
7-646-4
Vilella Martinez M.
Wu T.
4-67-56-4
Stakhovsky S.
Sweeny D.
2-66-36-1
Ymer E.
Daniel T.[5]
6-16-2
Safiullin R.
Lestienne C.
6-726-36-4
Cressy M.
Brown D.
7-656-4
Tomic B.
Smith J.
6-45-77-67
Ferreira Silva F.
Barrere G.[1]
6-36-4
Troicki V.
Stebe C.[11]
6-46-2
Q2
Machac T.
Meligeni Alves F.
6-17-64
Barrere G.[1]
Janvier M.
6-24-66-1
Dellien H.[2]
Harris A.
6-47-66
Van De Zandschulp B.
Menezes J.
6-36-716-4
Ymer E.
Huesler M.[27]
1-66-36-2
Alcaraz C.[21]
Karlovskiy E.
7-617-64
Laaksonen H.[15]
Diez S.
3-66-46-2
Dzumhur D.[7]
Lenz J.
6-26-2
Lestienne C.
Gunneswaran P.[12]
6-26-3
Cressy M.
Maden Y.
2-66-36-4
Brown D.
Taberner C.[22]
6-37-5
Daniel T.[5]
Marterer M.
6-36-4
Ferreira Silva F.
Milojevic N.[18]
2-66-16-4
Halys Q.
Ilkel C.
2-67-626-1
Coppejans K.
Safwat M.[31]
6-36-4
Smith J.
Griekspoor T.
2-66-36-4
Stakhovsky S.
Kubler J.
7-646-4
Rinderknech A.
Hoang A.[8]
7-626-4
Bourgue M.
Rola B.[32]
6-26-746-3
Vilella Martinez M.
Cerundolo F.[19]
W/O
Muller A.
Polansky P.
6-06-1
Tomic B.
Schoolkate T.
6-41-67-63
Stebe C.[11]
Hijikata R.
6-46-2
Troicki V.
Blanch U.
7-56-3
Haase R.
Moroni G.
6-47-5
Sweeny D.
Kudla D.[4]
W/O
Mmoh M.
Li Z.
2-66-47-67
Torpegaard M.
Zhang Z.
6-14-66-1
Safiullin R.
Krueger M.
6-16-4
Gojo B.
Giustino L.[29]
6-37-67
Karatsev A.[3]
Purcell M.
6-16-2
Wu T.
Ramanathan R.
6-36-2
Q1
Menezes J.
Collarini A.
1-67-686-3
Vilella Martinez M.
Giannessi A.
6-16-3
Karlovskiy E.
Mena F.
3-66-36-2
Maden Y.
Ito T.
6-46-2
Griekspoor T.
Bourchier H.
7-666-3
Alcaraz C.[21]
Horansky F.
5-76-16-4
Harris A.
Bemelmans R.
6-45-76-3
Smith J.
Lorenzi P.[25]
7-56-1
Gunneswaran P.[12]
Schnur B.
6-44-66-2
Ymer E.
Mott B.
6-46-3
Stakhovsky S.
Zapata Miralles B.[28]
7-646-4
Krueger M.
Couacaud E.
3-66-26-2
Van De Zandschulp B.
Musetti L.[13]
3-66-16-4
Torpegaard M.
Moraing M.
6-16-0
Mmoh M.
Petrovic D.[24]
6-36-2
Polansky P.
Molleker R.
6-787-56-3
Kudla D.[4]
Benchetrit E.
6-46-3
Halys Q.
Bonzi B.
6-06-2
Dzumhur D.[7]
Gomez E.
5-76-36-2
Li Z.
Kwiatkowski T.
4-66-36-4
Stebe C.[11]
Fabbiano T.
6-14-67-63
Moroni G.
Zverev M.
4-66-36-0
Rola B.[32]
Gulbis E.
7-626-3
Ilkel C.
Gojowczyk P.[26]
6-26-3
Hoang A.[8]
Robredo T.
6-17-5
Ferreira Silva F.
Lacko L.
6-36-2
Safwat M.[31]
De Greef A.
6-26-4
Janvier M.
Rosol L.
6-787-56-1
Milojevic N.[18]
Viola M.
6-46-4
Muller A.
Gaio F.[17]
6-16-1
Laaksonen H.[15]
Kamke T.
7-56-3
Brown D.
Moriya H.
6-22-66-1
Daniel T.[5]
Cid R.
4-66-26-1
Rinderknech A.
Masur D.
7-636-3
Lenz J.
Olivo R.
1-66-26-2
Kubler J.
Ebden M.
7-52-66-4
Ramanathan R.
Bagnis F.[10]
7-667-5
Dellien H.[2]
Tabilo A.
6-16-0
Blanch U.
Kuznetsov A.
6-46-1
Bourgue M.
Escobedo E.
7-656-2
Cerundolo F.[19]
Garcia Lopez G.
6-26-4
Haase R.
Seyboth Wild T.[6]
3-66-47-68
Machac T.
Domingues J.
6-36-1
Sweeny D.
Copil M.
7-632-66-3
Karatsev A.[3]
Nakashima B.
6-26-746-2
Schoolkate T.
Andreozzi G.
7-616-4
Zhang Z.
Donskoy E.[9]
7-56-3
Tomic B.
Kovalik J.[14]
6-43-66-4
Taberner C.[22]
Marcora R.
6-27-5
Barrere G.[1]
Kolar Z.
7-656-3
Diez S.
Vatutin A.
6-34-66-4
Hijikata R.
Eubanks C.
6-26-3
Cressy M.
Soeda G.[16]
6-736-47-5
Giustino L.[29]
Istomin D.
6-16-1
Lestienne C.
Broady L.
7-616-2
Troicki V.
Rodionov J.[23]
2-66-26-1
Gojo B.
Ofner S.
6-36-2
Safiullin R.
Otte O.[20]
7-666-4
Huesler M.[27]
Santillan A.
6-33-66-3
Purcell M.
Gaston H.
7-634-66-3
Marterer M.
Trungelliti M.
4-66-46-4
Wu T.
Clarke J.
6-26-4
Meligeni Alves F.
Klizan M.[30]
6-16-4
Coppejans K.
Marchenko I.
7-626-3