Tommy Paul vs Ji Sung Nam — Delray Beach Round of 32

Delray Beach · ATP · Round of 32
Tommy Paul
USA5
Tommy Paul
#25ATP
1949ELO
1881Hard ELO
$1.7MYTD
$15MCAREER
29 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWWWWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 4 January 2021
hard
KOR
Ji Sung Nam
32 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWWLLL
Paul T.
6-1 6-4
Nam J.
Paul T.
662
Nam J.
140

Tommy Paul defeated Ji Sung Nam 6-1 6-4 in the Delray Beach round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Tommy Paul came in defending last year's round of 16.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Paul T.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Nam J.

Nam J.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Paul T.

Serve advantage — Paul T.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Paul T.Nam J.
71
Serve
—
54
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Paul T.Nam J.
1st serve in·Even
62%
60%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
73%
68%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
54%
47%
Service points won·Slight edge
65%
60%
Return points won·Even
39%
40%
Break points saved·Slight edge
64%
57%
Aces / match·Clear edge
6.1
3.5
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.1
3.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 100). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Paul T.Nam J.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
93
0
Break points saved·Dominant
99
26
Break points won·Dominant
87
21
Deciding sets·Dominant
98
14
Tiebreaks·Dominant
96
12

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Paul T.Nam J.
Freshness·
84
—

Paul T.: 8 days rest · 3 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Hurkacz H.[4]
Korda S.
6-36-3
Semi-finals
Korda S.
Norrie C.
6-37-5
Hurkacz H.[4]
Harrison C.
7-646-4
Quarter-finals
Korda S.
Isner J.[2]
6-34-66-3
Harrison C.
Mager G.
7-626-4
Hurkacz H.[4]
Quiroz R.
6-46-4
Norrie C.
Tiafoe F.[8]
6-03-66-4
R16
Quiroz R.
Karlovic I.
6-26-4
Isner J.[2]
Monteiro T.
6-47-64
Norrie C.
Mannarino A.[3]
6-27-5
Tiafoe F.[8]
Fratangelo B.
6-43-66-1
Hurkacz H.[4]
Galan D.
6-26-2
Harrison C.
Garin C.[1]
7-636-2
Korda S.
Paul T.[5]
4-66-36-2
Mager G.
Querrey S.[6]
7-686-1
R32
Korda S.
Kwon S.
6-46-4
Norrie C.
Aragone J.
6-26-1
Fratangelo B.
King K.
6-26-2
Tiafoe F.[8]
Young D.
6-36-4
Querrey S.[6]
Mcdonald M.
6-36-4
Mager G.
Harrison R.
3-66-16-4
Harrison C.
Etcheverry T.
6-46-2
Monteiro T.
Bellucci T.
6-37-5
Quiroz R.
Rubin N.
7-616-3
Paul T.[5]
Nam J.
6-16-4
Galan D.
Martin A.
6-46-4
Karlovic I.
Andujar P.[7]
6-35-76-4