Camilo Ugo Carabelli vs Mariano Kestelboim — Sao Paulo CH Qualifying Round 2
Sao Paulo CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 2
#58ATP
1759ELO
1741Clay ELO
$653kYTD
$2.7MCAREER
27 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWWLWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 23 November 2020
clay
#692ATP
1198ELO
1189Clay ELO
30 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLLLW
Ugo Carabelli C.6-3 6-2
Kestelboim M.
Ugo Carabelli C.
662
Kestelboim M.
320
Camilo Ugo Carabelli defeated Mariano Kestelboim 6-3 6-2 in the Sao Paulo CH qualifying round 2 on clay. The result followed the form book — Camilo Ugo Carabelli came in ranked #58, leading the head-to-head 1–0. Camilo Ugo Carabelli extended the head-to-head to 2–0.
Key context
- Match story: Camilo Ugo Carabelli dropped just 5 games past Mariano Kestelboim.
Head to head
1–0| Date | Tournament | Round | Surface | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-02-22 | Cordoba | Q1 | clay | Camilo Ugo Carabelli | 6-0 6-4 |
Serve vs return
This seasonBaseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks
Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About
Serve & return on clay
Ugo Carabelli C.Kestelboim M.
24
Serve
—
28
Return
—
Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About
Statistics
This season1st serve in·Even
63%
67%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
67%
61%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
47%
Service points won·Even
60%
57%
Return points won·Even
41%
44%
Break points saved·Slight edge
60%
53%
Aces / match·Slight edge
2.7
1.4
Double faults / match·Even
2.4
2.5
Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 100). ATP, WTA & Challenger.
Clutch
Under pressureClutch Rating·Dominant
78
14
Break points saved·Dominant
90
7
Break points won·Dominant
62
18
Deciding sets·Dominant
96
68
Tiebreaks·
72
—
Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About
Conditions
Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Q2
Gonzalez A.[5]
Ribeiro E.
6-41-66-4
Reis Da Silva J.[8]
Lock B.[4]
6-16-4
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
Gutierrez O.[2]
6-16-3
Ugo Carabelli C.[1]
Kestelboim M.[7]
6-36-2