Vitaliy Sachko vs Facundo Bagnis — Lima CH Round of 32

Lima CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Vitaliy Sachko
UKR
Vitaliy Sachko
#198ATP
1584ELO
1550Clay ELO
$158kYTD
$835kCAREER
28 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWWWLWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 23 November 2020
clay
ARG6
Facundo Bagnis
#439ATP
1591ELO
1584Clay ELO
36 yrs · 183 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLWWWL
Sachko V.
3-6 6-1 7-6
Bagnis F.
Sachko V.
36772
Bagnis F.
61651

Vitaliy Sachko defeated Facundo Bagnis 3-6 6-1 7-6 in the Lima CH round of 32 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Facundo Bagnis came in leading the head-to-head 1–0, defending last year's semi-final. Vitaliy Sachko claimed a first win over Facundo Bagnis in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2022-05-16GenevaQ2clayFacundo Bagnis6-2 6-3

Serve vs return

This season
Sachko V.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Bagnis F.

Bagnis F.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Sachko V.

Serve advantage — Bagnis F.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Sachko V.Bagnis F.
1st serve in·Even
63%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
51%
Service points won·Even
61%
63%
Return points won·Even
40%
40%
Break points saved·Even
59%
62%
Aces / match·Slight edge
3.4
4.5
Double faults / match·Even
2.6
2.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (198 vs 198). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Sachko V.Bagnis F.
Clutch Rating·Even
51
54
Break points saved·Slight edge
81
92
Break points won·Clear edge
48
36
Deciding sets·Clear edge
76
89
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
19
3

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Sachko V.Bagnis F.
Freshness·
89
—

Sachko V.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 17 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Galan D.[7]
Tirante T.
6-13-66-3
Semi-finals
Galan D.[7]
Barrios Vera T.
7-644-66-4
Tirante T.
Sachko V.
6-26-4
Quarter-finals
Galan D.[7]
Carballes Baena R.[2]
7-666-2
Barrios Vera T.
Kopriva V.
6-746-36-2
Sachko V.
Tabilo A.
6-46-4
Tirante T.
Cerundolo F.
6-26-0
R16
Carballes Baena R.[2]
Olivo R.
5-76-06-4
Galan D.[7]
Cervantes Huegun I.
6-36-2
Kopriva V.
De Jong J.
6-03-66-1
Barrios Vera T.
Varillas J.[8]
6-16-2
Sachko V.
Cerundolo J.
6-46-3
Tabilo A.
Alvarez N.
6-45-76-2
Tirante T.
Roca Batalla O.
6-36-3
Cerundolo F.
Coria F.[1]
7-57-5
R32
Olivo R.
Panta Herreros J.
6-46-1
Carballes Baena R.[2]
Echazu M.
6-16-0
Sachko V.
Bagnis F.[6]
3-66-17-65
Coria F.[1]
Vilella Martinez M.
6-26-4
Cervantes Huegun I.
Leite W.
6-26-746-1
Galan D.[7]
Velotti A.
6-36-1
De Jong J.
Altamirano C.
6-26-4
Kopriva V.
Malla B.
6-26-3
Barrios Vera T.
Lama G.
7-623-66-2
Varillas J.[8]
Doumbia S.
6-17-66
Cerundolo J.
Huertas Del Pino C.
6-47-5
Alvarez N.
Jarry N.
6-22-66-2
Tabilo A.
Galdos S.
6-26-1
Roca Batalla O.
Krstin P.
7-57-5
Cerundolo F.
Sels J.
6-26-2
Tirante T.
Sousa P.[5]
6-26-1