Chun Hsin Tseng vs Sebastian Baez — Sao Paulo CH Round of 32

Sao Paulo CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Chun Hsin Tseng
TPE
Chun Hsin Tseng
#234ATP
1554ELO
1541Clay ELO
$99kYTD
$1.7MCAREER
24 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWLWLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 23 November 2020
clay
Sebastian Baez
ARG
Sebastian Baez
#56ATP
1759ELO
1718Clay ELO
$924kYTD
$6.9MCAREER
25 yrs · 170 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWWWWW
Tseng C.
6-3 3-6 6-4
Baez S.
Tseng C.
6362
Baez S.
3641

Chun Hsin Tseng defeated Sebastian Baez 6-3 3-6 6-4 in the Sao Paulo CH round of 32 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Sebastian Baez came in ranked #56, leading the head-to-head 2–0. Chun Hsin Tseng claimed a first win over Sebastian Baez in three meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 2–1.

Key context

  • Match story: Chun Hsin Tseng closed it out in three sets, 6–3 3–6 6–4.

Head to head

0–2
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2026-03-04Indian Wells MastersR128hardSebastian Baez6-3 6-2
2025-02-17Rio de JaneiroQFclaySebastian Baez6-4 6-1

Serve vs return

This season
Tseng C.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Baez S.

Baez S.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Tseng C.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Tseng C.Baez S.
—
Serve
7
—
Return
43

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Tseng C.Baez S.
1st serve in·Clear edge
58%
72%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
64%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
52%
Service points won·Even
61%
60%
Return points won·Even
39%
40%
Break points saved·Even
61%
60%
Aces / match·Slight edge
3.0
2.0
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.2
1.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Tseng C.Baez S.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
26
87
Break points saved·Clear edge
83
96
Break points won·Dominant
15
86
Deciding sets·Dominant
31
88
Tiebreaks·Dominant
23
83

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Tseng C.Baez S.
Freshness·
—
100

Baez S.: 15 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Meligeni Alves F.
Ferreira Silva F.[6]
6-27-61
Semi-finals
Ferreira Silva F.[6]
Menezes J.[7]
6-46-3
Meligeni Alves F.
Sakamoto P.
6-26-4
Quarter-finals
Menezes J.[7]
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
6-26-2
Ferreira Silva F.[6]
Ugo Carabelli C.
7-56-2
Meligeni Alves F.
Popko D.[5]
2-66-36-3
Sakamoto P.
Janvier M.
6-23-66-1
R16
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
Luz O.
6-42-66-3
Menezes J.[7]
Tseng C.
6-36-3
Ferreira Silva F.[6]
Bellucci T.
6-36-1
Popko D.[5]
Quiroz R.
6-16-1
Meligeni Alves F.
Safwat M.[3]
6-37-67
Sakamoto P.
Ficovich J.[8]
7-647-5
Janvier M.
Monteiro T.[1]
7-656-746-4
Ugo Carabelli C.
Lindell C.
6-26-3
R32
Bellucci T.
Gabashvili T.
6-26-0
Luz O.
Seyboth Wild T.[2]
7-51-66-3
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
Uchida K.
6-25-76-3
Tseng C.
Baez S.
6-33-66-4
Ugo Carabelli C.
Gomez E.[4]
5-76-36-0
Lindell C.
Reis Da Silva J.
6-24-66-3
Ferreira Silva F.[6]
Dougaz A.
4-67-656-1
Meligeni Alves F.
Lock B.
6-46-1
Ficovich J.[8]
Gonzalez A.
6-37-64
Sakamoto P.
Ribeiro Marcondes I.
6-16-777-5
Janvier M.
Ortega Olmedo R.
5-77-56-2
Monteiro T.[1]
Elias G.
6-36-2
Safwat M.[3]
Guinard M.
6-23-63-0
Menezes J.[7]
Sorgi J.
6-16-1
Quiroz R.
Arguello F.
6-706-36-1
Popko D.[5]
Gomez Herrera C.
6-33-66-1