Brandon Nakashima vs Roberto Cid — Orlando CH Round of 32

Orlando CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Brandon Nakashima
USA
Brandon Nakashima
#32ATP
1839ELO
1788Hard ELO
$990kYTD
$7.9MCAREER
24 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 16 November 2020
hard
DOM
Roberto Cid
32 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWLLLLW
Nakashima B.
6-1 6-3
Cid R.
Nakashima B.
662
Cid R.
130

Brandon Nakashima defeated Roberto Cid 6-1 6-3 in the Orlando CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Nakashima B.serving87% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Cid R.

Cid R.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Nakashima B.

Serve advantage — Nakashima B.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Nakashima B.Cid R.
61
Serve
—
23
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Nakashima B.Cid R.
1st serve in·Slight edge
66%
60%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
75%
64%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
54%
46%
Service points won·Slight edge
68%
57%
Return points won·Slight edge
35%
40%
Break points saved·Clear edge
66%
54%
Aces / match·Dominant
8.5
2.1
Double faults / match·Dominant
1.2
3.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 106). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Nakashima B.Cid R.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
56
0
Break points saved·Dominant
99
15
Break points won·Clear edge
13
26
Deciding sets·Dominant
64
4
Tiebreaks·Dominant
89
1

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Nakashima B.Cid R.
Freshness·
88
—

Nakashima B.: 11 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Nakashima B.
Gunneswaran P.[4]
6-36-4
Semi-finals
Nakashima B.
Krueger M.
6-16-3
Gunneswaran P.[4]
Eubanks C.
6-47-62
Quarter-finals
Eubanks C.
Kudla D.[2]
5-77-636-3
Gunneswaran P.[4]
Popko D.[6]
6-06-3
Krueger M.
Ritschard A.
6-46-756-1
Nakashima B.
Mcdonald M.[8]
6-37-68
R16
Ritschard A.
Chappell N.
6-36-4
Kudla D.[2]
Kypson P.
6-46-4
Eubanks C.
Moriya H.
6-26-1
Krueger M.
Fratangelo B.
3-66-26-2
Mcdonald M.[8]
Ymer E.
6-36-3
Nakashima B.
Monteiro T.[1]
6-46-3
Gunneswaran P.[4]
Wu T.
5-77-52-0
Popko D.[6]
Svajda Z.
7-51-67-5
R32
Gunneswaran P.[4]
Doumbia S.
6-37-5
Kypson P.
Harrison C.
6-37-68
Eubanks C.
Kwiatkowski T.
6-716-36-1
Moriya H.
Safwat M.[5]
6-16-1
Wu T.
Bellucci T.
6-26-2
Svajda Z.
Holt B.
7-56-3
Chappell N.
Ramanathan R.[7]
6-36-4
Ritschard A.
Blanch U.
6-46-3
Krueger M.
Polansky P.
6-46-4
Fratangelo B.
Galan D.[3]
6-36-3
Mcdonald M.[8]
Gabashvili T.
6-26-1
Ymer E.
Tseng C.
7-57-63
Nakashima B.
Cid R.
6-16-3
Monteiro T.[1]
Kozlov S.
6-16-3
Kudla D.[2]
King K.
6-46-3
Popko D.[6]
Rubin N.
6-16-2