Sebastian Baez vs Facundo Mena — Guayaquil CH Round of 16

Guayaquil CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Sebastian Baez
ARG
Sebastian Baez
#56ATP
1759ELO
1718Clay ELO
$924kYTD
$6.9MCAREER
25 yrs · 170 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWWWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 16 November 2020
clay
Facundo Mena
ARG
Facundo Mena
#331ATP
1427ELO
1406Clay ELO
33 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLWLWLL
Baez S.
7-6 6-2
Mena F.
Baez S.
7762
Mena F.
6420

Sebastian Baez defeated Facundo Mena 7-6 6-2 in the Guayaquil CH round of 16 on clay. The result followed the form book — Sebastian Baez came in ranked #56.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Baez S.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Mena F.

Mena F.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Baez S.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Baez S.Mena F.
7
Serve
—
43
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Baez S.Mena F.
1st serve in·Clear edge
72%
56%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
64%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
50%
Service points won·Even
60%
62%
Return points won·Even
40%
39%
Break points saved·Even
60%
60%
Aces / match·Dominant
2.0
5.4
Double faults / match·Slight edge
1.8
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Baez S.Mena F.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
87
9
Break points saved·Dominant
96
57
Break points won·Dominant
86
7
Deciding sets·Dominant
88
28
Tiebreaks·Dominant
83
10

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Baez S.Mena F.
Freshness·Dominant
100
70

Baez S.: 15 days rest · Mena F.: 4 days rest · 3 matches, 88 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Cerundolo F.
Martin A.[3]
6-43-66-2
Semi-finals
Cerundolo F.
Carballes Baena R.[2]
6-26-1
Martin A.[3]
De Jong J.
6-32-66-3
Quarter-finals
Cerundolo F.
Munar J.[4]
4-66-46-2
Martin A.[3]
Baez S.
6-46-4
De Jong J.
Roca Batalla O.
6-26-2
Carballes Baena R.[2]
Sousa P.[5]
6-46-2
R16
Carballes Baena R.[2]
Olivo R.
6-46-4
Munar J.[4]
Lindell C.
6-04-66-4
Cerundolo F.
Varillas J.[6]
6-16-797-62
Baez S.
Mena F.
7-646-2
Martin A.[3]
Barrios Vera T.
6-46-1
De Jong J.
Tabilo A.[8]
6-26-2
Roca Batalla O.
Escobar G.
6-46-3
Sousa P.[5]
Kopriva V.
1-66-36-4
R32
Carballes Baena R.[2]
Casanova H.
5-0
Munar J.[4]
Ficovich J.
5-76-46-2
Barrios Vera T.
Tirante T.
6-36-2
Kopriva V.
Krstin P.
6-16-4
Cerundolo F.
Sakamoto P.
6-36-3
Varillas J.[6]
Meligeni Alves F.
7-56-4
Mena F.
Gomez E.[7]
3-67-676-2
Baez S.
Quiroz R.
7-57-61
Martin A.[3]
Ortega Olmedo R.
6-47-5
De Jong J.
Vilella Martinez M.
5-76-37-5
Olivo R.
Sels J.
4-66-26-4
Roca Batalla O.
Coria F.[1]
7-676-727-68
Sousa P.[5]
Etcheverry T.
2-66-46-4
Tabilo A.[8]
Menezes J.
6-37-5
Lindell C.
March C.
7-656-4
Escobar G.
Hidalgo D.
6-37-65