Mikael Torpegaard vs Brandon NakashimaCary CH Quarter-final

Cary CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
32 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWWLLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 9 November 2020
hard
#32ATP
1839ELO
1788Hard ELO
$990kYTD
$7.9MCAREER
24 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLWWL
Torpegaard M.
6-2 3-6 7-5
Nakashima B.
Torpegaard M.
6372
Nakashima B.
2651

Mikael Torpegaard defeated Brandon Nakashima 6-2 3-6 7-5 in the Cary CH quarter-final on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Torpegaard M.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Nakashima B.

Nakashima B.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Torpegaard M.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Torpegaard M.Nakashima B.
Serve
61
Return
23

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
1st serve in·Slight edge
59%
66%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
70%
75%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
49%
54%
Service points won·Slight edge
61%
68%
Return points won·Even
38%
35%
Break points saved·Clear edge
51%
66%
Aces / match·Dominant
4.9
8.5
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.5
1.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (76 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Clutch Rating·Dominant
4
56
Break points saved·Dominant
35
99
Break points won·Even
13
13
Deciding sets·Dominant
16
64
Tiebreaks·Dominant
39
89

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Freshness·
90

Nakashima B.: 12 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast