Matteo Viola vs Nikola Milojevic — Bratislava CH Round of 16

Bratislava CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
ITA
Matteo Viola
39 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLLLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 9 November 2020
hard
SRB6
Nikola Milojevic
31 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLL
Viola M.
7-6 4-6 6-3
Milojevic N.
Viola M.
77462
Milojevic N.
65631

Matteo Viola defeated Nikola Milojevic 7-6 4-6 6-3 in the Bratislava CH round of 16 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Nikola Milojevic came in leading the head-to-head 1–0, defending last year's round of 64. Matteo Viola claimed a first win over Nikola Milojevic in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

  • Match story: Matteo Viola closed it out in three sets, 7–6 4–6 6–3.

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2021-01-10Doha Aus Open QualiesQ1hardNikola Milojevic6-4 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Viola M.serving66% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Milojevic N.

Milojevic N.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Viola M.

Serve advantage — Milojevic N.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Viola M.Milojevic N.
1st serve in·Slight edge
65%
60%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
63%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
47%
Service points won·Even
57%
60%
Return points won·Even
40%
40%
Break points saved·Even
54%
54%
Aces / match·Clear edge
1.5
3.5
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.6
4.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (94 vs 168). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Viola M.Milojevic N.
Clutch Rating·Even
8
10
Break points saved·Slight edge
20
30
Break points won·Even
25
27
Deciding sets·Even
15
11
Tiebreaks·Even
71
69

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Marterer M.
Machac T.
6-736-27-5
Semi-finals
Marterer M.
Hoang A.[4]
6-36-4
Machac T.
Klein L.
7-656-2
Quarter-finals
Machac T.
Viola M.
6-26-4
Marterer M.
Stakhovsky S.
W/O
Hoang A.[4]
Bourgue M.
W/O
Klein L.
Ruusuvuori E.[1]
6-47-5
R16
Stakhovsky S.
Safiullin R.
4-66-46-4
Marterer M.
Rola B.
7-646-2
Hoang A.[4]
Marcora R.
6-36-4
Bourgue M.
Van De Zandschulp B.
7-606-766-1
Viola M.
Milojevic N.[6]
7-654-66-3
Machac T.
Majchrzak K.[3]
7-56-756-1
Klein L.
Giustino L.[8]
6-46-3
Ruusuvuori E.[1]
Rinderknech A.
6-16-4
R32
Machac T.
Schnur B.
6-46-4
Marterer M.
Lenz J.
7-56-4
Van De Zandschulp B.
Laaksonen H.[5]
6-33-66-3
Hoang A.[4]
Halys Q.
6-36-3
Rinderknech A.
Broady L.
6-46-757-5
Milojevic N.[6]
Arnaboldi A.
7-57-64
Rola B.
Uchiyama Y.[2]
7-666-4
Stakhovsky S.
Lacko L.
7-57-66
Safiullin R.
Gaio F.[7]
6-36-4
Marcora R.
Cressy M.
2-66-47-64
Bourgue M.
Ofner S.
7-646-1
Viola M.
Lehecka J.
2-66-47-65
Majchrzak K.[3]
Molcan A.
6-26-1
Giustino L.[8]
Maden Y.
7-53-66-4
Klein L.
Horansky F.
6-46-4
Ruusuvuori E.[1]
Diez S.
6-36-3