Tomas Machac vs Matteo Viola — Bratislava CH Quarter-final

Bratislava CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Tomas Machac
CZE
Tomas Machac
#53ATP
1866ELO
1829Hard ELO
$832kYTD
$6.8MCAREER
25 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWWLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 9 November 2020
hard
ITA
Matteo Viola
39 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLLLLL
Machac T.
6-2 6-4
Viola M.
Machac T.
662
Viola M.
240

Tomas Machac defeated Matteo Viola 6-2 6-4 in the Bratislava CH quarter-final on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Matteo Viola came in defending last year's round of 64.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Machac T.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Viola M.

Viola M.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Machac T.

Serve advantage — Machac T.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Machac T.Viola M.
30
Serve
—
25
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Machac T.Viola M.
1st serve in·Even
62%
65%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
70%
63%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
54%
47%
Service points won·Slight edge
64%
57%
Return points won·Even
38%
40%
Break points saved·Slight edge
62%
54%
Aces / match·Dominant
5.0
1.5
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.5
3.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 94). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Machac T.Viola M.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
90
8
Break points saved·Dominant
98
20
Break points won·Dominant
80
25
Deciding sets·Dominant
94
15
Tiebreaks·Dominant
97
71

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Marterer M.
Machac T.
6-736-27-5
Semi-finals
Marterer M.
Hoang A.[4]
6-36-4
Machac T.
Klein L.
7-656-2
Quarter-finals
Machac T.
Viola M.
6-26-4
Marterer M.
Stakhovsky S.
W/O
Hoang A.[4]
Bourgue M.
W/O
Klein L.
Ruusuvuori E.[1]
6-47-5
R16
Stakhovsky S.
Safiullin R.
4-66-46-4
Marterer M.
Rola B.
7-646-2
Hoang A.[4]
Marcora R.
6-36-4
Bourgue M.
Van De Zandschulp B.
7-606-766-1
Viola M.
Milojevic N.[6]
7-654-66-3
Machac T.
Majchrzak K.[3]
7-56-756-1
Klein L.
Giustino L.[8]
6-46-3
Ruusuvuori E.[1]
Rinderknech A.
6-16-4
R32
Machac T.
Schnur B.
6-46-4
Marterer M.
Lenz J.
7-56-4
Van De Zandschulp B.
Laaksonen H.[5]
6-33-66-3
Hoang A.[4]
Halys Q.
6-36-3
Rinderknech A.
Broady L.
6-46-757-5
Milojevic N.[6]
Arnaboldi A.
7-57-64
Rola B.
Uchiyama Y.[2]
7-666-4
Stakhovsky S.
Lacko L.
7-57-66
Safiullin R.
Gaio F.[7]
6-36-4
Marcora R.
Cressy M.
2-66-47-64
Bourgue M.
Ofner S.
7-646-1
Viola M.
Lehecka J.
2-66-47-65
Majchrzak K.[3]
Molcan A.
6-26-1
Giustino L.[8]
Maden Y.
7-53-66-4
Klein L.
Horansky F.
6-46-4
Ruusuvuori E.[1]
Diez S.
6-36-3