Tomas Machac vs Brayden Schnur — Bratislava CH Round of 32

Bratislava CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Tomas Machac
CZE
Tomas Machac
#53ATP
1866ELO
1829Hard ELO
$832kYTD
$6.8MCAREER
25 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWWLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 9 November 2020
hard
CAN
Brayden Schnur
31 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLLLLLLLW
Machac T.
6-4 6-4
Schnur B.
Machac T.
662
Schnur B.
440

Tomas Machac defeated Brayden Schnur 6-4 6-4 in the Bratislava CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Tomas Machac came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Tomas Machac extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

  • Match story: Tomas Machac edged a tight contest from start to finish — 6–4 6–4.

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2021-06-28WimbledonQ2grassTomas Machac7-6(4) 6-0
View full head-to-head →

Serve vs return

This season
Machac T.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Schnur B.

Schnur B.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Machac T.

Serve advantage — Machac T.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Machac T.Schnur B.
30
Serve
—
25
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Machac T.Schnur B.
1st serve in·Even
62%
65%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
69%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
54%
48%
Service points won·Even
64%
62%
Return points won·Even
38%
37%
Break points saved·Even
62%
60%
Aces / match·Clear edge
5.0
6.5
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.5
3.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 95). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Machac T.Schnur B.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
90
27
Break points saved·Clear edge
98
86
Break points won·Dominant
80
4
Deciding sets·Dominant
94
14
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
97
77

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Marterer M.
Machac T.
6-736-27-5
Semi-finals
Marterer M.
Hoang A.[4]
6-36-4
Machac T.
Klein L.
7-656-2
Quarter-finals
Machac T.
Viola M.
6-26-4
Marterer M.
Stakhovsky S.
W/O
Hoang A.[4]
Bourgue M.
W/O
Klein L.
Ruusuvuori E.[1]
6-47-5
R16
Stakhovsky S.
Safiullin R.
4-66-46-4
Marterer M.
Rola B.
7-646-2
Hoang A.[4]
Marcora R.
6-36-4
Bourgue M.
Van De Zandschulp B.
7-606-766-1
Viola M.
Milojevic N.[6]
7-654-66-3
Machac T.
Majchrzak K.[3]
7-56-756-1
Klein L.
Giustino L.[8]
6-46-3
Ruusuvuori E.[1]
Rinderknech A.
6-16-4
R32
Machac T.
Schnur B.
6-46-4
Marterer M.
Lenz J.
7-56-4
Van De Zandschulp B.
Laaksonen H.[5]
6-33-66-3
Hoang A.[4]
Halys Q.
6-36-3
Rinderknech A.
Broady L.
6-46-757-5
Milojevic N.[6]
Arnaboldi A.
7-57-64
Rola B.
Uchiyama Y.[2]
7-666-4
Stakhovsky S.
Lacko L.
7-57-66
Safiullin R.
Gaio F.[7]
6-36-4
Marcora R.
Cressy M.
2-66-47-64
Bourgue M.
Ofner S.
7-646-1
Viola M.
Lehecka J.
2-66-47-65
Majchrzak K.[3]
Molcan A.
6-26-1
Giustino L.[8]
Maden Y.
7-53-66-4
Klein L.
Horansky F.
6-46-4
Ruusuvuori E.[1]
Diez S.
6-36-3