Mitchell Krueger vs Elias Ymer — Cary CH Round of 32

Cary CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Mitchell Krueger
USA
Mitchell Krueger
#364ATP
1461ELO
1436Hard ELO
32 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLLLLLLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 9 November 2020
hard
Elias Ymer
SWE
Elias Ymer
#183ATP
1548ELO
1527Hard ELO
$191kYTD
$2.4MCAREER
30 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWWLWWW
Krueger M.
6-1 6-2
Ymer E.
Krueger M.
662
Ymer E.
120

Mitchell Krueger defeated Elias Ymer 6-1 6-2 in the Cary CH round of 32 on hard. Mitchell Krueger extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2019-03-18Miami MastersQ1hardMitchell Krueger6-7(5) 6-0 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Krueger M.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Ymer E.

Ymer E.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Krueger M.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Krueger M.Ymer E.
1st serve in·Even
64%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
48%
Service points won·Even
63%
61%
Return points won·Even
38%
38%
Break points saved·Even
60%
58%
Aces / match·Even
4.5
4.7
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.0
3.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Krueger M.Ymer E.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
16
48
Break points saved·Even
87
83
Break points won·Slight edge
14
23
Deciding sets·Dominant
13
78
Tiebreaks·Dominant
0
35

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Krueger M.Ymer E.
Freshness·Clear edge
87
100

Krueger M.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 20 games (7d) · Ymer E.: 20 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Kudla D.[2]
Gunneswaran P.[4]
3-66-36-0
Semi-finals
Kudla D.[2]
Galan D.[3]
6-766-16-4
Gunneswaran P.[4]
Torpegaard M.
W/O
Quarter-finals
Kudla D.[2]
Popko D.[7]
6-46-1
Galan D.[3]
Eubanks C.
6-46-4
Gunneswaran P.[4]
Bellucci T.
3-67-57-65
Torpegaard M.
Nakashima B.
6-23-67-5
R16
Galan D.[3]
Wu T.
6-36-3
Popko D.[7]
Krueger M.
6-33-66-3
Gunneswaran P.[4]
Sock J.
6-736-27-65
Nakashima B.
Galarneau A.
6-36-2
Torpegaard M.
Monteiro T.[1]
4-66-36-4
Eubanks C.
Mmoh M.[6]
W/O
Kudla D.[2]
Johns G.
6-26-1
Bellucci T.
Gabashvili T.
6-37-67
R32
Kudla D.[2]
King K.
6-26-1
Johns G.
Rubin N.
4-66-37-5
Krueger M.
Ymer E.
6-16-2
Popko D.[7]
Blanch U.
6-36-2
Galan D.[3]
Cid R.
7-656-1
Wu T.
Moriya H.
7-656-1
Eubanks C.
Harrison C.
7-57-5
Mmoh M.[6]
Nedovyesov A.
7-56-0
Bellucci T.
Safwat M.[5]
6-746-17-67
Gabashvili T.
Ramanathan R.
3-66-46-1
Gunneswaran P.[4]
Polansky P.
6-26-2
Galarneau A.
Mcdonald M.[8]
6-24-66-1
Nakashima B.
Kwiatkowski T.
4-66-47-5
Torpegaard M.
Blumberg W.
3-66-36-4
Monteiro T.[1]
Clezar G.
7-653-2
Sock J.
Fratangelo B.
7-6116-3