Cedrik Marcel Stebe vs Quentin Halys — Parma CH Semi-final

Parma CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
Cedrik Marcel Stebe
GER7
Cedrik Marcel Stebe
#366ATP
1556ELO
1545Clay ELO
35 yrs · 183 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWWLWWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 2 November 2020
clay
Quentin Halys
FRA
Quentin Halys
#90ATP
1707ELO
1664Clay ELO
$694kYTD
$5.4MCAREER
29 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLLWWL
Stebe C.
5-7 6-3 6-3
Halys Q.
Stebe C.
5662
Halys Q.
7331

Cedrik Marcel Stebe defeated Quentin Halys 5-7 6-3 6-3 in the Parma CH semi-final on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Quentin Halys came in ranked #90.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Stebe C.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Halys Q.

Halys Q.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Stebe C.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Stebe C.Halys Q.
1st serve in·Even
61%
58%
1st serve points won·Clear edge
67%
79%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
51%
Service points won·Slight edge
60%
67%
Return points won·Slight edge
41%
34%
Break points saved·Slight edge
58%
65%
Aces / match·Dominant
3.3
11.0
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.1
3.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (154 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Stebe C.Halys Q.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
51
57
Break points saved·Clear edge
75
97
Break points won·Slight edge
10
4
Deciding sets·Slight edge
86
75
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
68
91

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Stebe C.Halys Q.
Freshness·
—
93

Halys Q.: 12 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Tiafoe F.[1]
Caruso S.[5]
6-33-66-4
Stebe C.[7]
Broady L.
6-46-4
Semi-finals
Caruso S.[5]
Popyrin A.
6-46-4
Tiafoe F.[1]
Delbonis F.[4]
3-66-36-4
Stebe C.[7]
Halys Q.
5-76-36-3
Broady L.
Arnaboldi A.
4-66-36-4
Quarter-finals
Popyrin A.
Ficovich J.
6-766-47-5
Tiafoe F.[1]
Baldi F.
7-637-5
Caruso S.[5]
Djere L.[3]
6-42-66-4
Delbonis F.[4]
Cecchinato M.
4-66-26-2
Halys Q.
Vanni L.
7-627-64
Broady L.
Cressy M.[8]
7-634-67-62
Arnaboldi A.
Ferreira Silva F.
3-66-36-4
Stebe C.[7]
Marcora R.
6-26-2
R16
Popyrin A.
Muller A.
6-46-4
Ficovich J.
Krueger M.
6-16-4
Djere L.[3]
Nagal S.
7-54-66-4
Caruso S.[5]
Machac T.
6-27-5
Cecchinato M.
Kohlschreiber P.[6]
7-56-3
Tiafoe F.[1]
Musetti L.
6-33-66-3
Baldi F.
Mager G.[7]
4-66-33-1
Delbonis F.[4]
Lorenzi P.
6-16-4
Ferreira Silva F.
Lestienne C.
W/O
Marcora R.
Musetti L.[4]
3-66-36-4
Stebe C.[7]
Coppejans K.
7-636-4
Cressy M.[8]
Nardi L.
6-37-64
Arnaboldi A.
Barrere G.[1]
4-66-26-2
Broady L.
Kavcic B.
6-15-76-3
Vanni L.
Bourgue M.
7-642-67-66
Halys Q.
Viola M.
4-66-37-64
R32
Lorenzi P.
Gunneswaran P.
7-656-2
Delbonis F.[4]
Seppi A.
6-17-66
Mager G.[7]
Hanfmann Y.
7-57-65
Musetti L.
Gaio F.
6-36-2
Tiafoe F.[1]
Rola B.
7-616-3
Popyrin A.
Londero J.[2]
1-62-1
Machac T.
Varillas J.
6-24-2
Krueger M.
Istomin D.
6-46-4
Ficovich J.
Petrovic D.
6-37-65
Djere L.[3]
Jung J.
6-26-4
Nagal S.
Zeppieri G.
6-46-4
Caruso S.[5]
Grenier H.
4-66-36-4
Kohlschreiber P.[6]
Seyboth Wild T.
6-36-1
Cecchinato M.
Majchrzak K.
6-36-4
Muller A.
Cressy M.
6-34-66-3
Baldi F.
Daniel T.
5-77-656-1
Vanni L.
Lamasine T.
6-26-4
Coppejans K.
Gigante M.
5-76-36-3
Stebe C.[7]
Pellegrino A.
3-66-46-4
Cressy M.[8]
Janvier M.
6-26-4
Nardi L.
Zeppieri G.
7-55-76-4
Lestienne C.
Milojevic N.[6]
7-677-5
Ferreira Silva F.
Draper J.
6-746-47-5
Bourgue M.
Rune H.
7-656-1
Halys Q.
Gaio F.[5]
6-757-626-4
Musetti L.[4]
Ornago F.
6-37-5
Marcora R.
Napolitano S.
6-36-4
Viola M.
Popko D.
6-41-0
Kavcic B.
Wolf J.[3]
6-32-0
Barrere G.[1]
Karlovskiy E.
7-687-65
Broady L.
Krstin P.
6-26-4
Arnaboldi A.
Jaziri M.
6-36-4