Jordan Thompson vs Cameron Norrie — Nur-Sultan Round of 32

Nur-Sultan · ATP · Round of 32
Jordan Thompson
AUS8
Jordan Thompson
#309ATP
1772ELO
1733Hard ELO
$153kYTD
$9.6MCAREER
32 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLWWLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 26 October 2020
hard
Cameron Norrie
GBR
Cameron Norrie
#38ATP
1829ELO
1789Hard ELO
$963kYTD
$15MCAREER
30 yrs · 188 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLWWLW
Thompson J.
5-7 7-6 6-2
Norrie C.
Thompson J.
57862
Norrie C.
76621

Jordan Thompson defeated Cameron Norrie 5-7 7-6 6-2 in the Nur-Sultan round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Cameron Norrie came in ranked #38, leading the head-to-head 3–1. Jordan Thompson narrowed the head-to-head to 3–2.

Key context

Head to head

1–3
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2023-06-19Queen's ClubR16grassCameron Norrie4-6 6-3 6-2
2019-07-22AtlantaR32hardCameron Norrie7-6(3) 4-6 6-3
2019-03-18Miami MastersR128hardJordan Thompson4-6 7-6(5) 6-3
2018-08-27US OpenR128hardCameron Norrie7-5 4-6 6-4 6-3

Serve vs return

This season
Thompson J.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Norrie C.

Norrie C.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Thompson J.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Thompson J.Norrie C.
—
Serve
45
—
Return
34

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Thompson J.Norrie C.
1st serve in·Slight edge
60%
65%
1st serve points won·Even
74%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
54%
52%
Service points won·Even
66%
64%
Return points won·Even
37%
37%
Break points saved·Even
63%
65%
Aces / match·Clear edge
7.2
5.2
Double faults / match·Clear edge
1.3
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Thompson J.Norrie C.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
70
89
Break points saved·Even
97
99
Break points won·Dominant
24
83
Deciding sets·Slight edge
91
98
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
95
89

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Thompson J.Norrie C.
Freshness·
—
100

Norrie C.: 15 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Millman J.[4]
Mannarino A.[3]
7-56-1
Semi-finals
Mannarino A.[3]
Ruusuvuori E.
7-56-2
Millman J.[4]
Tiafoe F.
3-66-46-4
Quarter-finals
Ruusuvuori E.
Kukushkin M.
6-36-1
Mannarino A.[3]
Mcdonald M.
6-16-4
Millman J.[4]
Paul T.[7]
6-756-47-65
Tiafoe F.
Gerasimov E.
7-655-77-5
R16
Ruusuvuori E.
Thompson J.[8]
6-23-66-4
Mannarino A.[3]
Sugita Y.
6-16-1
Mcdonald M.
Seppi A.
3-66-36-3
Paul T.[7]
Albot R.
6-46-0
Tiafoe F.
Kecmanovic M.[2]
7-56-3
Gerasimov E.
Vesely J.
4-66-36-4
Millman J.[4]
Verdasco F.
6-36-4
Kukushkin M.
Paire B.[1]
6-747-626-1
R32
Kukushkin M.
Delbonis F.
6-756-36-2
Ruusuvuori E.
Skatov T.
6-26-0
Thompson J.[8]
Norrie C.
5-77-666-2
Sugita Y.
Dzumhur D.
6-15-76-4
Mcdonald M.
Bublik A.[6]
6-36-2
Paul T.[7]
Travaglia S.
7-626-3
Albot R.
Popko D.
4-66-46-4
Verdasco F.
Duckworth J.
6-47-65
Vesely J.
Sandgren T.[5]
6-47-67
Gerasimov E.
Harris L.
6-33-67-63
Seppi A.
Karatsev A.
6-31-66-3
Tiafoe F.
Moutet C.
6-36-2