Hugo Gaston vs Sumit Nagal — Hamburg CH Round of 32

Hamburg CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Hugo Gaston
FRA
Hugo Gaston
#107ATP
1622ELO
1628Hard ELO
$355kYTD
$4.0MCAREER
25 yrs · 173 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLWWWL
0 — 0
Sets
Retired
Monday, 26 October 2020
hard
Sumit Nagal
IND5
Sumit Nagal
#241ATP
1543ELO
1476Hard ELO
28 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLWWWWWLLL
Gaston H.
7-5 4-1
Nagal S.
Gaston H.
74–
Nagal S.
51–

Hugo Gaston advanced when Sumit Nagal retired 7-5 4-1 in the Hamburg CH round of 32.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Gaston H.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Nagal S.

Nagal S.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Gaston H.

Serve advantage — Nagal S.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Gaston H.Nagal S.
1st serve in·Clear edge
55%
70%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
64%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
51%
Service points won·Even
60%
60%
Return points won·Even
39%
42%
Break points saved·Even
59%
58%
Aces / match·Clear edge
2.9
1.4
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.2
1.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Gaston H.Nagal S.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
74
33
Break points saved·Clear edge
91
69
Break points won·Clear edge
57
35
Deciding sets·Dominant
78
16
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
93
84

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Gaston H.Nagal S.
Freshness·Dominant
51
96

Gaston H.: 2 days rest · 5 matches, 128 games (7d) · Nagal S.: 8 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Daniel T.[2]
Ofner S.
6-16-2
Semi-finals
Ofner S.
Majchrzak K.[1]
7-636-1
Daniel T.[2]
Van De Zandschulp B.
W/O
Quarter-finals
Daniel T.[2]
Laaksonen H.[6]
6-16-4
Van De Zandschulp B.
Stebe C.
6-36-3
Ofner S.
Safiullin R.
7-644-66-4
Majchrzak K.[1]
Milojevic N.[7]
6-36-1
R16
Daniel T.[2]
Marterer M.
4-66-46-3
Laaksonen H.[6]
Kamke T.
7-607-5
Van De Zandschulp B.
Marchenko I.
6-47-5
Ofner S.
Gaston H.
7-656-2
Safiullin R.
Wolf J.[3]
7-616-4
Milojevic N.[7]
Kotov P.
7-656-1
Majchrzak K.[1]
Maden Y.
6-46-4
Stebe C.
Otte O.[8]
6-36-3
R32
Gaston H.
Nagal S.[5]
7-54-1
Daniel T.[2]
Rinderknech A.
6-33-66-4
Van De Zandschulp B.
Bonzi B.
6-47-5
Otte O.[8]
Huesler M.
6-26-3
Ofner S.
Brown D.
7-666-2
Safiullin R.
Napolitano S.
6-26-2
Wolf J.[3]
Bachinger M.
6-46-3
Milojevic N.[7]
Lacko L.
7-56-4
Kotov P.
Gojo B.
6-46-767-5
Maden Y.
Coppejans K.
6-06-1
Majchrzak K.[1]
Marcora R.
6-36-3
Marchenko I.
Altmaier D.[4]
6-43-2
Stebe C.
Horansky F.
6-26-4
Laaksonen H.[6]
Torpegaard M.
6-33-66-4
Kamke T.
Gunneswaran P.
3-66-46-1
Marterer M.
Cressy M.
6-46-4