Taro Daniel vs Henri Laaksonen — Hamburg CH Quarter-final

Hamburg CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Taro Daniel
JPN2
Taro Daniel
#194ATP
1567ELO
1512Hard ELO
33 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWWWWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 26 October 2020
hard
SUI6
Henri Laaksonen
34 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLLLW
Daniel T.
6-1 6-4
Laaksonen H.
Daniel T.
662
Laaksonen H.
140

Taro Daniel defeated Henri Laaksonen 6-1 6-4 in the Hamburg CH quarter-final on hard. Taro Daniel extended the head-to-head to 2–1.

Key context

Head to head

1–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2022-08-15Cincinnati MastersQ1hardHenri Laaksonen6-4 7-5
2014-01-13Australian OpenQ1hardTaro Daniel6-2 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Daniel T.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Laaksonen H.

Laaksonen H.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Daniel T.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Daniel T.Laaksonen H.
1st serve in·Even
60%
56%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
49%
Service points won·Even
62%
61%
Return points won·Even
37%
38%
Break points saved·Even
62%
60%
Aces / match·Slight edge
4.0
5.4
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.1
2.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 196). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Daniel T.Laaksonen H.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
42
51
Break points saved·Slight edge
93
84
Break points won·Clear edge
37
20
Deciding sets·Dominant
18
92
Tiebreaks·Dominant
81
25

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Daniel T.Laaksonen H.
Freshness·
59
—

Daniel T.: 1 day rest · 4 matches, 83 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Daniel T.[2]
Ofner S.
6-16-2
Semi-finals
Ofner S.
Majchrzak K.[1]
7-636-1
Daniel T.[2]
Van De Zandschulp B.
W/O
Quarter-finals
Daniel T.[2]
Laaksonen H.[6]
6-16-4
Van De Zandschulp B.
Stebe C.
6-36-3
Ofner S.
Safiullin R.
7-644-66-4
Majchrzak K.[1]
Milojevic N.[7]
6-36-1
R16
Daniel T.[2]
Marterer M.
4-66-46-3
Laaksonen H.[6]
Kamke T.
7-607-5
Van De Zandschulp B.
Marchenko I.
6-47-5
Ofner S.
Gaston H.
7-656-2
Safiullin R.
Wolf J.[3]
7-616-4
Milojevic N.[7]
Kotov P.
7-656-1
Majchrzak K.[1]
Maden Y.
6-46-4
Stebe C.
Otte O.[8]
6-36-3
R32
Gaston H.
Nagal S.[5]
7-54-1
Daniel T.[2]
Rinderknech A.
6-33-66-4
Van De Zandschulp B.
Bonzi B.
6-47-5
Otte O.[8]
Huesler M.
6-26-3
Ofner S.
Brown D.
7-666-2
Safiullin R.
Napolitano S.
6-26-2
Wolf J.[3]
Bachinger M.
6-46-3
Milojevic N.[7]
Lacko L.
7-56-4
Kotov P.
Gojo B.
6-46-767-5
Maden Y.
Coppejans K.
6-06-1
Majchrzak K.[1]
Marcora R.
6-36-3
Marchenko I.
Altmaier D.[4]
6-43-2
Stebe C.
Horansky F.
6-26-4
Laaksonen H.[6]
Torpegaard M.
6-33-66-4
Kamke T.
Gunneswaran P.
3-66-46-1
Marterer M.
Cressy M.
6-46-4