Borna Gojo vs Quentin Halys — Lisbon CH Round of 32

Lisbon CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Borna Gojo
CRO
Borna Gojo
#168ATP
1683ELO
1642Clay ELO
$139kYTD
$1.6MCAREER
28 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 12 October 2020
clay
Quentin Halys
FRA
Quentin Halys
#90ATP
1707ELO
1664Clay ELO
$694kYTD
$5.4MCAREER
29 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLLWWL
Gojo B.
6-2 6-4
Halys Q.
Gojo B.
662
Halys Q.
240

Borna Gojo defeated Quentin Halys 6-2 6-4 in the Lisbon CH round of 32 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Quentin Halys came in ranked #90.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Gojo B.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Halys Q.

Halys Q.serving87% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Gojo B.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Gojo B.Halys Q.
1st serve in·Slight edge
64%
58%
1st serve points won·Even
76%
79%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
51%
Service points won·Even
67%
67%
Return points won·Even
36%
34%
Break points saved·Even
66%
65%
Aces / match·Even
10.5
11.1
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.9
3.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Gojo B.Halys Q.
Clutch Rating·Even
53
57
Break points saved·Even
95
97
Break points won·Slight edge
10
4
Deciding sets·Slight edge
70
75
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
73
91

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Gojo B.Halys Q.
Freshness·Slight edge
100
93

Gojo B.: 20 days rest · Halys Q.: 12 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Munar J.[1]
Sousa P.[2]
7-636-2
Semi-finals
Sousa P.[2]
Giannessi A.
6-46-4
Munar J.[1]
Gaio F.[5]
6-36-0
Quarter-finals
Sousa P.[2]
Popko D.
7-56-2
Gaio F.[5]
Clezar G.
5-76-47-64
Munar J.[1]
Muller A.
6-26-2
Giannessi A.
Kuzmanov D.
6-46-3
R16
Muller A.
Griekspoor T.[6]
6-10-1
Sousa P.[2]
Grenier H.
7-56-0
Popko D.
Oliveira G.
6-26-2
Giannessi A.
Lorenzi P.[4]
7-56-3
Kuzmanov D.
Bonzi B.
7-56-2
Gaio F.[5]
Benchetrit E.
6-47-5
Clezar G.
Borges N.
6-37-65
Munar J.[1]
Gojo B.
6-17-65
R32
Benchetrit E.
Olivo R.
6-37-67
Gojo B.
Halys Q.
6-26-4
Popko D.
Menezes J.
6-36-4
Oliveira G.
Rola B.[7]
1-67-627-5
Lorenzi P.[4]
Blanch U.
6-26-3
Kuzmanov D.
Ferreira Silva F.
7-56-3
Clezar G.
Janvier M.
7-686-2
Borges N.
Dzumhur D.[3]
7-686-1
Muller A.
Clarke J.
6-13-66-3
Munar J.[1]
Ofner S.
6-46-2
Sousa P.[2]
Elias G.
6-756-16-3
Grenier H.
Bourgue M.
5-76-06-1
Giannessi A.
Cid R.
6-35-76-2
Bonzi B.
Domingues J.[8]
6-36-0
Gaio F.[5]
Kolar Z.
6-36-3
Griekspoor T.[6]
Lestienne C.
7-52-66-3