Tomas Machac vs Alexey Vatutin — Parma CH Qualifying Round 1

Parma CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 1
Tomas Machac
CZE
Tomas Machac
#53ATP
1866ELO
1783Clay ELO
$832kYTD
$6.8MCAREER
25 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWWLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 5 October 2020
clay
RUS5
Alexey Vatutin
#610ATP
1415ELO
1374Clay ELO
33 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLWLLW
Machac T.
6-0 6-2
Vatutin A.
Machac T.
662
Vatutin A.
020

Tomas Machac defeated Alexey Vatutin 6-0 6-2 in the Parma CH qualifying round 1 on clay. The result followed the form book — Tomas Machac came in ranked #53.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Machac T.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Vatutin A.

Vatutin A.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Machac T.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Machac T.Vatutin A.
12
Serve
—
48
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Machac T.Vatutin A.
1st serve in·Even
62%
65%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
70%
64%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
54%
49%
Service points won·Slight edge
64%
59%
Return points won·Even
38%
42%
Break points saved·Slight edge
62%
55%
Aces / match·Dominant
5.0
1.4
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.5
3.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Machac T.Vatutin A.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
90
0
Break points saved·Dominant
98
18
Break points won·Dominant
80
32
Deciding sets·Dominant
94
10
Tiebreaks·Dominant
97
4

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Q2
Machac T.
Ficovich J.[1]
6-46-4
Baldi F.
Passaro F.
6-27-63
Grenier H.[8]
Blanch U.
6-46-4
Muller A.[6]
Cid R.[2]
6-47-5
Vanni L.
Arnaboldi A.[5]
6-47-64
Napolitano S.[3]
Rune H.
3-66-46-1
Lamasine T.[2]
Gigante M.
7-666-3
Draper J.[6]
Karlovskiy E.[1]
6-36-0
Q1
Passaro F.
Trungelliti M.[7]
6-37-64
Baldi F.
Lestienne C.[4]
6-37-63
Grenier H.[8]
Galovic V.
6-26-4
Blanch U.
Benchetrit E.[3]
6-20-0
Muller A.[6]
Gabashvili T.
6-36-2
Cid R.[2]
Arnaboldi F.
6-36-1
Machac T.
Vatutin A.[5]
6-06-2
Ficovich J.[1]
Arnaldi M.
4-66-16-0
Vanni L.
Kuzmanov D.[4]
7-53-66-1
Arnaboldi A.[5]
Darderi L.
6-36-4
Rune H.
Dalla Valle E.[8]
7-614-3
Napolitano S.[3]
Bortolotti M.
6-07-63
Gigante M.
Ornago F.[7]
6-15-77-62
Lamasine T.[2]
Cobolli F.
6-26-1
Draper J.[6]
Bocchi L.
6-47-61