Lorenzo Musetti vs Federico Gaio — Parma CH Round of 32

Parma CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Lorenzo Musetti
ITA
Lorenzo Musetti
#14ATP
1869ELO
1853Clay ELO
$961kYTD
$15MCAREER
24 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWWLWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 5 October 2020
clay
ITA
Federico Gaio
34 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLWWLWLLL
Musetti L.
6-3 6-2
Gaio F.
Musetti L.
662
Gaio F.
320

Lorenzo Musetti defeated Federico Gaio 6-3 6-2 in the Parma CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Musetti L.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Gaio F.

Gaio F.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Musetti L.

Serve advantage — Musetti L.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Musetti L.Gaio F.
34
Serve
—
—
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Musetti L.Gaio F.
1st serve in·Slight edge
65%
57%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
53%
49%
Service points won·Even
64%
62%
Return points won·Even
38%
37%
Break points saved·Even
60%
60%
Aces / match·Even
4.0
4.5
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.1
3.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Musetti L.Gaio F.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
89
20
Break points saved·Clear edge
98
76
Break points won·Dominant
82
3
Deciding sets·Dominant
99
40
Tiebreaks·Dominant
95
7

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Tiafoe F.[1]
Caruso S.[5]
6-33-66-4
Stebe C.[7]
Broady L.
6-46-4
Semi-finals
Caruso S.[5]
Popyrin A.
6-46-4
Tiafoe F.[1]
Delbonis F.[4]
3-66-36-4
Stebe C.[7]
Halys Q.
5-76-36-3
Broady L.
Arnaboldi A.
4-66-36-4
Quarter-finals
Popyrin A.
Ficovich J.
6-766-47-5
Tiafoe F.[1]
Baldi F.
7-637-5
Caruso S.[5]
Djere L.[3]
6-42-66-4
Delbonis F.[4]
Cecchinato M.
4-66-26-2
Halys Q.
Vanni L.
7-627-64
Broady L.
Cressy M.[8]
7-634-67-62
Arnaboldi A.
Ferreira Silva F.
3-66-36-4
Stebe C.[7]
Marcora R.
6-26-2
R16
Popyrin A.
Muller A.
6-46-4
Ficovich J.
Krueger M.
6-16-4
Djere L.[3]
Nagal S.
7-54-66-4
Caruso S.[5]
Machac T.
6-27-5
Cecchinato M.
Kohlschreiber P.[6]
7-56-3
Tiafoe F.[1]
Musetti L.
6-33-66-3
Baldi F.
Mager G.[7]
4-66-33-1
Delbonis F.[4]
Lorenzi P.
6-16-4
Ferreira Silva F.
Lestienne C.
W/O
Marcora R.
Musetti L.[4]
3-66-36-4
Stebe C.[7]
Coppejans K.
7-636-4
Cressy M.[8]
Nardi L.
6-37-64
Arnaboldi A.
Barrere G.[1]
4-66-26-2
Broady L.
Kavcic B.
6-15-76-3
Vanni L.
Bourgue M.
7-642-67-66
Halys Q.
Viola M.
4-66-37-64
R32
Lorenzi P.
Gunneswaran P.
7-656-2
Delbonis F.[4]
Seppi A.
6-17-66
Mager G.[7]
Hanfmann Y.
7-57-65
Musetti L.
Gaio F.
6-36-2
Tiafoe F.[1]
Rola B.
7-616-3
Popyrin A.
Londero J.[2]
1-62-1
Machac T.
Varillas J.
6-24-2
Krueger M.
Istomin D.
6-46-4
Ficovich J.
Petrovic D.
6-37-65
Djere L.[3]
Jung J.
6-26-4
Nagal S.
Zeppieri G.
6-46-4
Caruso S.[5]
Grenier H.
4-66-36-4
Kohlschreiber P.[6]
Seyboth Wild T.
6-36-1
Cecchinato M.
Majchrzak K.
6-36-4
Muller A.
Cressy M.
6-34-66-3
Baldi F.
Daniel T.
5-77-656-1
Vanni L.
Lamasine T.
6-26-4
Coppejans K.
Gigante M.
5-76-36-3
Stebe C.[7]
Pellegrino A.
3-66-46-4
Cressy M.[8]
Janvier M.
6-26-4
Nardi L.
Zeppieri G.
7-55-76-4
Lestienne C.
Milojevic N.[6]
7-677-5
Ferreira Silva F.
Draper J.
6-746-47-5
Bourgue M.
Rune H.
7-656-1
Halys Q.
Gaio F.[5]
6-757-626-4
Musetti L.[4]
Ornago F.
6-37-5
Marcora R.
Napolitano S.
6-36-4
Viola M.
Popko D.
6-41-0
Kavcic B.
Wolf J.[3]
6-32-0
Barrere G.[1]
Karlovskiy E.
7-687-65
Broady L.
Krstin P.
6-26-4
Arnaboldi A.
Jaziri M.
6-36-4