Salvatore Caruso vs Tomas Machac — Parma CH Round of 16

Parma CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
ITA5
Salvatore Caruso
33 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWLWLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 5 October 2020
clay
Tomas Machac
CZE
Tomas Machac
#53ATP
1866ELO
1783Clay ELO
$832kYTD
$6.8MCAREER
25 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWWLWW
Caruso S.
6-2 7-5
Machac T.
Caruso S.
672
Machac T.
250

Salvatore Caruso defeated Tomas Machac 6-2 7-5 in the Parma CH round of 16 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Caruso S.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Machac T.

Machac T.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Caruso S.

Serve advantage — Machac T.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Caruso S.Machac T.
—
Serve
12
—
Return
48

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Caruso S.Machac T.
1st serve in·Even
60%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
66%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
54%
Service points won·Slight edge
59%
64%
Return points won·Even
39%
38%
Break points saved·Slight edge
57%
62%
Aces / match·Clear edge
2.7
5.0
Double faults / match·Even
2.6
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (194 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Caruso S.Machac T.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
41
90
Break points saved·Dominant
65
98
Break points won·Dominant
30
80
Deciding sets·Clear edge
80
94
Tiebreaks·Dominant
18
97

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Tiafoe F.[1]
Caruso S.[5]
6-33-66-4
Stebe C.[7]
Broady L.
6-46-4
Semi-finals
Caruso S.[5]
Popyrin A.
6-46-4
Tiafoe F.[1]
Delbonis F.[4]
3-66-36-4
Stebe C.[7]
Halys Q.
5-76-36-3
Broady L.
Arnaboldi A.
4-66-36-4
Quarter-finals
Popyrin A.
Ficovich J.
6-766-47-5
Tiafoe F.[1]
Baldi F.
7-637-5
Caruso S.[5]
Djere L.[3]
6-42-66-4
Delbonis F.[4]
Cecchinato M.
4-66-26-2
Halys Q.
Vanni L.
7-627-64
Broady L.
Cressy M.[8]
7-634-67-62
Arnaboldi A.
Ferreira Silva F.
3-66-36-4
Stebe C.[7]
Marcora R.
6-26-2
R16
Popyrin A.
Muller A.
6-46-4
Ficovich J.
Krueger M.
6-16-4
Djere L.[3]
Nagal S.
7-54-66-4
Caruso S.[5]
Machac T.
6-27-5
Cecchinato M.
Kohlschreiber P.[6]
7-56-3
Tiafoe F.[1]
Musetti L.
6-33-66-3
Baldi F.
Mager G.[7]
4-66-33-1
Delbonis F.[4]
Lorenzi P.
6-16-4
Ferreira Silva F.
Lestienne C.
W/O
Marcora R.
Musetti L.[4]
3-66-36-4
Stebe C.[7]
Coppejans K.
7-636-4
Cressy M.[8]
Nardi L.
6-37-64
Arnaboldi A.
Barrere G.[1]
4-66-26-2
Broady L.
Kavcic B.
6-15-76-3
Vanni L.
Bourgue M.
7-642-67-66
Halys Q.
Viola M.
4-66-37-64
R32
Lorenzi P.
Gunneswaran P.
7-656-2
Delbonis F.[4]
Seppi A.
6-17-66
Mager G.[7]
Hanfmann Y.
7-57-65
Musetti L.
Gaio F.
6-36-2
Tiafoe F.[1]
Rola B.
7-616-3
Popyrin A.
Londero J.[2]
1-62-1
Machac T.
Varillas J.
6-24-2
Krueger M.
Istomin D.
6-46-4
Ficovich J.
Petrovic D.
6-37-65
Djere L.[3]
Jung J.
6-26-4
Nagal S.
Zeppieri G.
6-46-4
Caruso S.[5]
Grenier H.
4-66-36-4
Kohlschreiber P.[6]
Seyboth Wild T.
6-36-1
Cecchinato M.
Majchrzak K.
6-36-4
Muller A.
Cressy M.
6-34-66-3
Baldi F.
Daniel T.
5-77-656-1
Vanni L.
Lamasine T.
6-26-4
Coppejans K.
Gigante M.
5-76-36-3
Stebe C.[7]
Pellegrino A.
3-66-46-4
Cressy M.[8]
Janvier M.
6-26-4
Nardi L.
Zeppieri G.
7-55-76-4
Lestienne C.
Milojevic N.[6]
7-677-5
Ferreira Silva F.
Draper J.
6-746-47-5
Bourgue M.
Rune H.
7-656-1
Halys Q.
Gaio F.[5]
6-757-626-4
Musetti L.[4]
Ornago F.
6-37-5
Marcora R.
Napolitano S.
6-36-4
Viola M.
Popko D.
6-41-0
Kavcic B.
Wolf J.[3]
6-32-0
Barrere G.[1]
Karlovskiy E.
7-687-65
Broady L.
Krstin P.
6-26-4
Arnaboldi A.
Jaziri M.
6-36-4