Blaz Kavcic vs Sumit Nagal — Biella CH Round of 32

Biella CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
SLO
Blaz Kavcic
39 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWWLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 28 September 2020
clay
Sumit Nagal
IND3
Sumit Nagal
#219ATP
1543ELO
1538Clay ELO
28 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWLLLL
Kavcic B.
7-6 6-4
Nagal S.
Kavcic B.
7762
Nagal S.
6440

Blaz Kavcic defeated Sumit Nagal 7-6 6-4 in the Biella CH round of 32 on clay. The result followed the form book — Blaz Kavcic came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Blaz Kavcic extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2018-02-26DubaiQ1hardBlaz Kavcic2-6 6-2 4-0 RET

Serve vs return

This season
Kavcic B.serving59% hold

wins 54% of points on serve vs Nagal S.

Nagal S.serving57% hold

wins 53% of points on serve vs Kavcic B.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Kavcic B.Nagal S.
1st serve in·Even
66%
70%
1st serve points won·Even
65%
64%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
51%
Service points won·Even
59%
60%
Return points won·Even
44%
42%
Break points saved·Even
55%
58%
Aces / match·Clear edge
3.3
1.4
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.9
1.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (54 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Kavcic B.Nagal S.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
27
33
Break points saved·Dominant
43
69
Break points won·Even
36
35
Deciding sets·Clear edge
32
16
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
75
84

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Kavcic B.Nagal S.
Freshness·
—
95

Nagal S.: 6 days rest · 1 match, 18 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Bagnis F.[4]
Kavcic B.
6-746-40-0
Semi-finals
Kavcic B.
Rola B.
5-76-46-1
Bagnis F.[4]
Oconnell C.[2]
6-46-4
Quarter-finals
Oconnell C.[2]
Istomin D.
6-36-3
Kavcic B.
Cressy M.
6-46-4
Rola B.
Viola M.
6-27-5
Bagnis F.[4]
Horansky F.
7-56-1
R16
Oconnell C.[2]
Ficovich J.
5-76-46-1
Istomin D.
Napolitano S.
6-36-4
Bagnis F.[4]
Muller A.
6-36-4
Horansky F.
Alcaraz C.
6-36-4
Kavcic B.
Tseng C.
3-66-36-3
Viola M.
Bertola R.
6-17-5
Rola B.
Collarini A.
6-06-3
Cressy M.
Pellegrino A.
6-737-686-0
R32
Oconnell C.[2]
Ramanathan R.
6-46-2
Ficovich J.
Garcia Lopez G.
6-36-2
Istomin D.
Marchenko I.
7-606-2
Napolitano S.
Lorenzi P.[5]
6-46-3
Bagnis F.[4]
Cid R.
7-56-1
Horansky F.
Lacko L.
6-26-2
Alcaraz C.
Varillas J.[8]
2-67-687-62
Pellegrino A.
Moroni G.
7-53-66-3
Tseng C.
Harris A.
6-16-2
Kavcic B.
Nagal S.[3]
7-646-4
Viola M.
Gaio F.[6]
4-67-656-2
Bertola R.
Robredo T.
7-57-5
Collarini A.
Arnaboldi A.
6-24-66-2
Rola B.
Seyboth Wild T.[1]
7-667-63
Muller A.
Felline G.
6-06-1
Cressy M.
Gunneswaran P.[7]
7-656-4