Denis Istomin vs Illya Marchenko — Biella CH Round of 32

Biella CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
UZB
Denis Istomin
39 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 28 September 2020
clay
UKR
Illya Marchenko
#1740ATP
38 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLLLLLL
Istomin D.
7-6 6-2
Marchenko I.
Istomin D.
7762
Marchenko I.
6020

Denis Istomin defeated Illya Marchenko 7-6 6-2 in the Biella CH round of 32 on clay. Denis Istomin extended the head-to-head to 3–2.

Key context

  • Match story: Denis Istomin closed it out in two sets, 7–6 6–2.

Head to head

2–2
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2010-10-25St. PetersburgR32carpetIllya Marchenko6-2 2-2 RET
2010-10-18MoscowR32hardDenis Istomin6-7(4) 6-2 6-2
2010-06-13EastbourneQFgrassDenis Istomin6-1 6-4
2009-10-19MoscowR32hardIllya Marchenko1-6 6-4 4-1 RET

Serve vs return

This season
Istomin D.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Marchenko I.

Marchenko I.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Istomin D.

Serve advantage — Marchenko I.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Istomin D.Marchenko I.
1st serve in·Slight edge
66%
56%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
68%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
51%
Service points won·Even
61%
63%
Return points won·Even
35%
37%
Break points saved·Even
59%
61%
Aces / match·Slight edge
4.5
5.5
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.2
3.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (113 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Istomin D.Marchenko I.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
29
13
Break points saved·Slight edge
90
80
Break points won·Even
5
7
Deciding sets·Dominant
44
13
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
18
10

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Bagnis F.[4]
Kavcic B.
6-746-40-0
Semi-finals
Kavcic B.
Rola B.
5-76-46-1
Bagnis F.[4]
Oconnell C.[2]
6-46-4
Quarter-finals
Oconnell C.[2]
Istomin D.
6-36-3
Kavcic B.
Cressy M.
6-46-4
Rola B.
Viola M.
6-27-5
Bagnis F.[4]
Horansky F.
7-56-1
R16
Oconnell C.[2]
Ficovich J.
5-76-46-1
Istomin D.
Napolitano S.
6-36-4
Bagnis F.[4]
Muller A.
6-36-4
Horansky F.
Alcaraz C.
6-36-4
Kavcic B.
Tseng C.
3-66-36-3
Viola M.
Bertola R.
6-17-5
Rola B.
Collarini A.
6-06-3
Cressy M.
Pellegrino A.
6-737-686-0
R32
Oconnell C.[2]
Ramanathan R.
6-46-2
Ficovich J.
Garcia Lopez G.
6-36-2
Istomin D.
Marchenko I.
7-606-2
Napolitano S.
Lorenzi P.[5]
6-46-3
Bagnis F.[4]
Cid R.
7-56-1
Horansky F.
Lacko L.
6-26-2
Alcaraz C.
Varillas J.[8]
2-67-687-62
Pellegrino A.
Moroni G.
7-53-66-3
Tseng C.
Harris A.
6-16-2
Kavcic B.
Nagal S.[3]
7-646-4
Viola M.
Gaio F.[6]
4-67-656-2
Bertola R.
Robredo T.
7-57-5
Collarini A.
Arnaboldi A.
6-24-66-2
Rola B.
Seyboth Wild T.[1]
7-667-63
Muller A.
Felline G.
6-06-1
Cressy M.
Gunneswaran P.[7]
7-656-4