Borna Gojo vs Alessandro Giannessi — Split CH Quarter-final

Split CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Borna Gojo
CRO
Borna Gojo
#168ATP
1683ELO
1642Clay ELO
$139kYTD
$1.6MCAREER
28 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 28 September 2020
clay
ITA
Alessandro Giannessi
36 yrs · 185 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLLLWLW
Gojo B.
6-3 6-3
Giannessi A.
Gojo B.
662
Giannessi A.
330

Borna Gojo defeated Alessandro Giannessi 6-3 6-3 in the Split CH quarter-final on clay. The result followed the form book — Borna Gojo came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Borna Gojo extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2022-05-23Roland GarrosR128clayBorna Gojo6-4 6-7(3) 6-7(4) 7-6(4) 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Gojo B.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Giannessi A.

Giannessi A.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Gojo B.

Serve advantage — Gojo B.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Gojo B.Giannessi A.
1st serve in·Even
64%
65%
1st serve points won·Clear edge
76%
64%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
49%
Service points won·Slight edge
67%
59%
Return points won·Even
36%
39%
Break points saved·Slight edge
66%
58%
Aces / match·Dominant
10.5
2.4
Double faults / match·Even
2.8
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Gojo B.Giannessi A.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
53
36
Break points saved·Clear edge
95
76
Break points won·Slight edge
10
20
Deciding sets·Slight edge
70
62
Tiebreaks·Dominant
73
25

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Gojo B.Giannessi A.
Freshness·
100
—

Gojo B.: 20 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Cerundolo F.
Sousa P.[1]
4-66-37-64
Semi-finals
Sousa P.[1]
Gojo B.
6-45-76-2
Cerundolo F.
Ajdukovic D.
6-726-46-3
Quarter-finals
Ajdukovic D.
Kovalik J.[2]
6-26-4
Cerundolo F.
Marterer M.
7-663-67-62
Gojo B.
Giannessi A.
6-36-3
Sousa P.[1]
Etcheverry T.
6-47-67
R16
Kovalik J.[2]
Ferreira Silva F.
2-66-27-5
Ajdukovic D.
Klizan M.[6]
6-06-4
Marterer M.
Taberner C.[4]
3-67-56-4
Cerundolo F.
Nakashima B.
6-36-1
Etcheverry T.
Troicki V.
6-16-1
Sousa P.[1]
Kolar Z.
6-13-66-2
Giannessi A.
Klahn B.[3]
7-673-0
Gojo B.
Van De Zandschulp B.[7]
7-682-66-4
R32
Marterer M.
Ymer E.
6-26-2
Kovalik J.[2]
Jaziri M.
6-46-706-0
Gojo B.
Barrios Vera T.
4-66-36-4
Giannessi A.
Serdarusic N.
6-46-4
Etcheverry T.
Celikbilek A.
6-46-0
Kolar Z.
Krueger M.
6-26-3
Sousa P.[1]
Grenier H.
6-46-4
Ajdukovic D.
Menezes J.
6-43-66-3
Van De Zandschulp B.[7]
Krstin P.
6-16-1
Nakashima B.
Petrovic D.[5]
7-52-67-65
Troicki V.
Ito T.[8]
6-26-4
Klahn B.[3]
Polansky P.
6-786-47-63
Ferreira Silva F.
Blanch U.
7-646-4
Klizan M.[6]
Lestienne C.
4-66-36-4
Taberner C.[4]
Mena F.
6-36-1
Cerundolo F.
Escobedo E.
5-77-646-3