Facundo Bagnis vs Alexandre Muller — Biella CH Round of 16

Biella CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
ARG4
Facundo Bagnis
#431ATP
1591ELO
1584Clay ELO
36 yrs · 183 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLWWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 28 September 2020
clay
Alexandre Muller
FRA
Alexandre Muller
#132ATP
1665ELO
1628Clay ELO
$426kYTD
$4.3MCAREER
29 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLL
Bagnis F.
6-3 6-4
Muller A.
Bagnis F.
662
Muller A.
340

Facundo Bagnis defeated Alexandre Muller 6-3 6-4 in the Biella CH round of 16 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Alexandre Muller came in ranked #132, but Facundo Bagnis had been the form player, winning 6 of their last 9 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Bagnis F.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Muller A.

Muller A.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Bagnis F.

Serve advantage — Bagnis F.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Bagnis F.Muller A.
1st serve in·Even
63%
65%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
50%
Service points won·Even
63%
62%
Return points won·Even
40%
38%
Break points saved·Even
62%
62%
Aces / match·Slight edge
4.5
3.5
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.7
2.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (198 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Bagnis F.Muller A.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
54
75
Break points saved·Even
92
94
Break points won·Slight edge
35
44
Deciding sets·Slight edge
89
95
Tiebreaks·Dominant
3
84

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Bagnis F.Muller A.
Freshness·
—
100

Muller A.: 15 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Bagnis F.[4]
Kavcic B.
6-746-40-0
Semi-finals
Kavcic B.
Rola B.
5-76-46-1
Bagnis F.[4]
Oconnell C.[2]
6-46-4
Quarter-finals
Oconnell C.[2]
Istomin D.
6-36-3
Kavcic B.
Cressy M.
6-46-4
Rola B.
Viola M.
6-27-5
Bagnis F.[4]
Horansky F.
7-56-1
R16
Oconnell C.[2]
Ficovich J.
5-76-46-1
Istomin D.
Napolitano S.
6-36-4
Bagnis F.[4]
Muller A.
6-36-4
Horansky F.
Alcaraz C.
6-36-4
Kavcic B.
Tseng C.
3-66-36-3
Viola M.
Bertola R.
6-17-5
Rola B.
Collarini A.
6-06-3
Cressy M.
Pellegrino A.
6-737-686-0
R32
Oconnell C.[2]
Ramanathan R.
6-46-2
Ficovich J.
Garcia Lopez G.
6-36-2
Istomin D.
Marchenko I.
7-606-2
Napolitano S.
Lorenzi P.[5]
6-46-3
Bagnis F.[4]
Cid R.
7-56-1
Horansky F.
Lacko L.
6-26-2
Alcaraz C.
Varillas J.[8]
2-67-687-62
Pellegrino A.
Moroni G.
7-53-66-3
Tseng C.
Harris A.
6-16-2
Kavcic B.
Nagal S.[3]
7-646-4
Viola M.
Gaio F.[6]
4-67-656-2
Bertola R.
Robredo T.
7-57-5
Collarini A.
Arnaboldi A.
6-24-66-2
Rola B.
Seyboth Wild T.[1]
7-667-63
Muller A.
Felline G.
6-06-1
Cressy M.
Gunneswaran P.[7]
7-656-4