Carlos Alcaraz vs Juan Pablo Varillas — Biella CH Round of 32

Biella CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Carlos Alcaraz
ESP
Carlos Alcaraz
#3ATP
2162ELO
2102Clay ELO
$4.4MYTD
$65MCAREER
23 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWWLWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 28 September 2020
clay
Juan Pablo Varillas
PER8
Juan Pablo Varillas
#279ATP
1440ELO
1431Clay ELO
30 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLWLLLL
Alcaraz C.
2-6 7-6 7-6
Varillas J.
Alcaraz C.
2710772
Varillas J.
668621

Carlos Alcaraz defeated Juan Pablo Varillas 2-6 7-6 7-6 in the Biella CH round of 32 on clay. The result followed the form book — Carlos Alcaraz came in ranked #3.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Alcaraz C.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Varillas J.

Varillas J.serving63% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Alcaraz C.

Serve advantage — Alcaraz C.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Alcaraz C.Varillas J.
1st serve in·Slight edge
65%
59%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
74%
68%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
57%
51%
Service points won·Slight edge
68%
61%
Return points won·Even
42%
40%
Break points saved·Slight edge
65%
59%
Aces / match·Slight edge
5.1
3.7
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.4
1.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Alcaraz C.Varillas J.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
98
55
Break points saved·Clear edge
100
80
Break points won·Dominant
99
43
Deciding sets·Dominant
100
63
Tiebreaks·Dominant
100
72

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Alcaraz C.Varillas J.
Freshness·
—
62

Varillas J.: 3 days rest · 3 matches, 84 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Bagnis F.[4]
Kavcic B.
6-746-40-0
Semi-finals
Kavcic B.
Rola B.
5-76-46-1
Bagnis F.[4]
Oconnell C.[2]
6-46-4
Quarter-finals
Oconnell C.[2]
Istomin D.
6-36-3
Kavcic B.
Cressy M.
6-46-4
Rola B.
Viola M.
6-27-5
Bagnis F.[4]
Horansky F.
7-56-1
R16
Oconnell C.[2]
Ficovich J.
5-76-46-1
Istomin D.
Napolitano S.
6-36-4
Bagnis F.[4]
Muller A.
6-36-4
Horansky F.
Alcaraz C.
6-36-4
Kavcic B.
Tseng C.
3-66-36-3
Viola M.
Bertola R.
6-17-5
Rola B.
Collarini A.
6-06-3
Cressy M.
Pellegrino A.
6-737-686-0
R32
Oconnell C.[2]
Ramanathan R.
6-46-2
Ficovich J.
Garcia Lopez G.
6-36-2
Istomin D.
Marchenko I.
7-606-2
Napolitano S.
Lorenzi P.[5]
6-46-3
Bagnis F.[4]
Cid R.
7-56-1
Horansky F.
Lacko L.
6-26-2
Alcaraz C.
Varillas J.[8]
2-67-687-62
Pellegrino A.
Moroni G.
7-53-66-3
Tseng C.
Harris A.
6-16-2
Kavcic B.
Nagal S.[3]
7-646-4
Viola M.
Gaio F.[6]
4-67-656-2
Bertola R.
Robredo T.
7-57-5
Collarini A.
Arnaboldi A.
6-24-66-2
Rola B.
Seyboth Wild T.[1]
7-667-63
Muller A.
Felline G.
6-06-1
Cressy M.
Gunneswaran P.[7]
7-656-4