Marc Andrea Huesler vs Borna Gojo — Sibiu CH Quarter-final

Sibiu CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Marc Andrea Huesler
SUI3
Marc Andrea Huesler
#307ATP
1504ELO
1480Clay ELO
30 yrs · 196 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLWLLWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 21 September 2020
clay
Borna Gojo
CRO
Borna Gojo
#168ATP
1683ELO
1642Clay ELO
$139kYTD
$1.6MCAREER
28 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLLWWW
Huesler M.
6-4 5-7 6-4
Gojo B.
Huesler M.
6562
Gojo B.
4741

Marc Andrea Huesler defeated Borna Gojo 6-4 5-7 6-4 in the Sibiu CH quarter-final on clay.

Key context

  • Match story: Marc Andrea Huesler edged a tight contest from start to finish — 6–4 5–7 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Huesler M.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Gojo B.

Gojo B.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Huesler M.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Huesler M.Gojo B.
1st serve in·Slight edge
59%
64%
1st serve points won·Even
75%
76%
2nd serve points won·Even
53%
50%
Service points won·Even
66%
67%
Return points won·Even
35%
36%
Break points saved·Even
65%
66%
Aces / match·Clear edge
8.0
10.5
Double faults / match·Even
2.6
2.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Huesler M.Gojo B.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
29
53
Break points saved·Even
95
95
Break points won·Even
7
10
Deciding sets·Dominant
13
70
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
67
73

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Huesler M.Gojo B.
Freshness·Clear edge
79
100

Huesler M.: 2 days rest · 2 matches, 42 games (7d) · Gojo B.: 20 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Huesler M.[3]
Etcheverry T.
7-56-0
Semi-finals
Etcheverry T.
Cerundolo F.[4]
6-36-0
Huesler M.[3]
Gomez Herrera C.
7-656-766-4
Quarter-finals
Gomez Herrera C.
Haerteis J.
6-36-786-2
Etcheverry T.
Meligeni Alves F.
6-36-0
Cerundolo F.[4]
Jaziri M.[7]
6-26-1
Huesler M.[3]
Gojo B.
6-45-76-4
R16
Etcheverry T.
Cerundolo J.
6-47-67
Meligeni Alves F.
Sekiguchi S.[8]
6-26-3
Gomez Herrera C.
Denolly C.
3-67-646-3
Cerundolo F.[4]
Cervantes Huegun I.
6-776-36-4
Jaziri M.[7]
Luz O.
6-37-63
Gojo B.
Barrios Vera T.
6-16-716-4
Huesler M.[3]
Ortega Olmedo R.
6-26-4
Haerteis J.
Rinderknech A.[1]
6-33-67-64
R32
Huesler M.[3]
Miedler L.
6-47-61
Gomez Herrera C.
Kopriva V.
6-26-3
Haerteis J.
Ionel N.
7-56-2
Cervantes Huegun I.
Ejupovic E.
6-37-62
Denolly C.
Karlovskiy E.[5]
6-35-76-0
Cerundolo F.[4]
Perchicot M.
6-46-3
Sekiguchi S.[8]
Dima D.
7-57-66
Etcheverry T.
Halys Q.[2]
7-634-67-62
Cerundolo J.
Mukund S.
6-47-65
Meligeni Alves F.
Kirkin E.
6-46-3
Luz O.
Cornea V.
6-13-66-2
Jaziri M.[7]
Zuk K.
6-46-2
Barrios Vera T.
Menendez Maceiras A.[6]
6-26-3
Gojo B.
Serdarusic N.
7-56-4
Ortega Olmedo R.
Roca Batalla O.
6-26-4
Rinderknech A.[1]
Durasovic V.
7-56-3