Taro Daniel vs Thiago Monteiro — Rome Masters Qualifying Round 1

Rome Masters · ATP · Qualifying Round 1
Taro Daniel
JPN
Taro Daniel
#194ATP
1567ELO
1542Clay ELO
33 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLWWWWWWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 14 September 2020
clay
Thiago Monteiro
BRA16
Thiago Monteiro
#290ATP
1568ELO
1554Clay ELO
32 yrs · 183 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLWWLW
Daniel T.
4-6 7-6 6-4
Monteiro T.
Daniel T.
47762
Monteiro T.
66441

Taro Daniel defeated Thiago Monteiro 4-6 7-6 6-4 in the Rome Masters qualifying round 1 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Daniel T.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Monteiro T.

Monteiro T.serving84% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Daniel T.

Serve advantage — Monteiro T.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Daniel T.Monteiro T.
1st serve in·Even
60%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
54%
Service points won·Even
62%
66%
Return points won·Even
37%
36%
Break points saved·Even
61%
62%
Aces / match·Slight edge
4.1
4.8
Double faults / match·Even
2.1
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Daniel T.Monteiro T.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
42
56
Break points saved·Even
93
95
Break points won·Clear edge
37
16
Deciding sets·Dominant
16
66
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
81
89

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Daniel T.Monteiro T.
Freshness·Slight edge
69
59

Daniel T.: 1 day rest · 4 matches, 75 games (7d) · Monteiro T.: 1 day rest · 2 matches, 67 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Weather
32°CClear
Wind 2 km/hHumidity 29%
Q3
Sandgren T.[1]
Sousa J.[9]
6-36-0
Bagnis F.
Ymer M.[11]
7-56-1
Koepfer D.
Kukushkin M.
2-66-46-2
Martinez P.
Martin A.
6-36-2
Davidovich Fokina A.
Moutet C.[15]
6-16-2
Musetti L.
Zeppieri G.
6-15-76-3
Cecchinato M.
Kovalik J.
6-26-1
Coria F.
Dzumhur D.
6-16-1
Q2
Bagnis F.
Duckworth J.
7-646-1
Dzumhur D.
Robredo T.
7-56-4
Sandgren T.[1]
Popyrin A.
6-766-46-2
Musetti L.
Mayer L.
7-646-3
Sousa J.[9]
Ivashka I.
6-47-63
Koepfer D.
Simon G.[2]
7-52-66-3
Zeppieri G.
Dellien H.
7-673-66-0
Ymer M.[11]
Polmans M.
6-46-4
Kovalik J.
Bedene A.[3]
7-656-3
Martinez P.
Viola M.
4-66-26-4
Kukushkin M.
Daniel T.
6-26-2
Cecchinato M.
Klahn B.
6-16-4
Davidovich Fokina A.
Sugita Y.
6-06-1
Coria F.
Diez S.
6-46-2
Martin A.
Chardy J.[7]
6-26-2
Moutet C.[15]
Marcora R.
6-726-32-1
Q1
Klahn B.
Seppi A.
6-24-67-61
Moutet C.[15]
Carballes Baena R.
7-54-2
Martinez P.
Forti F.
6-46-0
Dellien H.
Giannessi A.
7-56-4
Kukushkin M.
Ymer E.
6-736-47-5
Daniel T.
Monteiro T.[16]
4-67-646-4
Marcora R.
Horansky F.
6-26-4
Sousa J.[9]
Darderi L.
3-66-36-1
Viola M.
Kwon S.[13]
7-651-67-65
Chardy J.[7]
Venus M.
6-16-1
Robredo T.
Moroni G.
1-66-36-4
Diez S.
Albot R.[10]
6-47-5
Kovalik J.
Donskoy E.
7-56-4
Duckworth J.
Uchiyama Y.
7-624-0
Zeppieri G.
Norrie C.[14]
6-36-1
Cecchinato M.
Gerasimov E.[12]
6-25-76-3
Koepfer D.
Cobolli F.
7-623-66-0
Martin A.
Galan D.
5-77-647-5
Coria F.
Lorenzi P.
3-66-47-5
Dzumhur D.
Verdasco F.[5]
6-06-2
Mayer L.
Berrettini J.
6-36-2
Polmans M.
Gulbis E.
7-666-1
Bagnis F.
Paul T.[6]
7-56-4
Ivashka I.
Gigante M.
6-34-67-61
Sugita Y.
Harris L.
6-46-2
Musetti L.
Zapata Miralles B.
7-620-66-1
Ymer M.[11]
Giron M.
4-67-57-66
Davidovich Fokina A.
Londero J.[8]
2-66-26-2
Popyrin A.
Saville L.
6-37-66