Steven Diez vs Radu Albot — Rome Masters Qualifying Round 1

Rome Masters · ATP · Qualifying Round 1
CAN
Steven Diez
#1565ATP
35 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWWLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 14 September 2020
clay
Radu Albot
MDA10
Radu Albot
#490ATP
1453ELO
1440Clay ELO
36 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLWWWL
Diez S.
6-4 7-5
Albot R.
Diez S.
672
Albot R.
450

Steven Diez defeated Radu Albot 6-4 7-5 in the Rome Masters qualifying round 1 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Radu Albot came in ranked #490, defending last year's round of 32.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Diez S.serving59% hold

wins 53% of points on serve vs Albot R.

Albot R.serving66% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Diez S.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Diez S.Albot R.
1st serve in·Even
63%
65%
1st serve points won·Even
64%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
50%
Service points won·Even
58%
60%
Return points won·Even
40%
41%
Break points saved·Even
56%
59%
Aces / match·Even
1.7
2.0
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.3
2.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Diez S.Albot R.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
4
46
Break points saved·Dominant
48
85
Break points won·Clear edge
31
19
Deciding sets·Dominant
3
76
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
8
29

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Diez S.Albot R.
Freshness·
—
93

Albot R.: 9 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Weather
32°CClear
Wind 2 km/hHumidity 29%
Q3
Sandgren T.[1]
Sousa J.[9]
6-36-0
Bagnis F.
Ymer M.[11]
7-56-1
Koepfer D.
Kukushkin M.
2-66-46-2
Martinez P.
Martin A.
6-36-2
Davidovich Fokina A.
Moutet C.[15]
6-16-2
Musetti L.
Zeppieri G.
6-15-76-3
Cecchinato M.
Kovalik J.
6-26-1
Coria F.
Dzumhur D.
6-16-1
Q2
Bagnis F.
Duckworth J.
7-646-1
Dzumhur D.
Robredo T.
7-56-4
Sandgren T.[1]
Popyrin A.
6-766-46-2
Musetti L.
Mayer L.
7-646-3
Sousa J.[9]
Ivashka I.
6-47-63
Koepfer D.
Simon G.[2]
7-52-66-3
Zeppieri G.
Dellien H.
7-673-66-0
Ymer M.[11]
Polmans M.
6-46-4
Kovalik J.
Bedene A.[3]
7-656-3
Martinez P.
Viola M.
4-66-26-4
Kukushkin M.
Daniel T.
6-26-2
Cecchinato M.
Klahn B.
6-16-4
Davidovich Fokina A.
Sugita Y.
6-06-1
Coria F.
Diez S.
6-46-2
Martin A.
Chardy J.[7]
6-26-2
Moutet C.[15]
Marcora R.
6-726-32-1
Q1
Klahn B.
Seppi A.
6-24-67-61
Moutet C.[15]
Carballes Baena R.
7-54-2
Martinez P.
Forti F.
6-46-0
Dellien H.
Giannessi A.
7-56-4
Kukushkin M.
Ymer E.
6-736-47-5
Daniel T.
Monteiro T.[16]
4-67-646-4
Marcora R.
Horansky F.
6-26-4
Sousa J.[9]
Darderi L.
3-66-36-1
Viola M.
Kwon S.[13]
7-651-67-65
Chardy J.[7]
Venus M.
6-16-1
Robredo T.
Moroni G.
1-66-36-4
Diez S.
Albot R.[10]
6-47-5
Kovalik J.
Donskoy E.
7-56-4
Duckworth J.
Uchiyama Y.
7-624-0
Zeppieri G.
Norrie C.[14]
6-36-1
Cecchinato M.
Gerasimov E.[12]
6-25-76-3
Koepfer D.
Cobolli F.
7-623-66-0
Martin A.
Galan D.
5-77-647-5
Coria F.
Lorenzi P.
3-66-47-5
Dzumhur D.
Verdasco F.[5]
6-06-2
Mayer L.
Berrettini J.
6-36-2
Polmans M.
Gulbis E.
7-666-1
Bagnis F.
Paul T.[6]
7-56-4
Ivashka I.
Gigante M.
6-34-67-61
Sugita Y.
Harris L.
6-46-2
Musetti L.
Zapata Miralles B.
7-620-66-1
Ymer M.[11]
Giron M.
4-67-57-66
Davidovich Fokina A.
Londero J.[8]
2-66-26-2
Popyrin A.
Saville L.
6-37-66