Stan Wawrinka vs Botic Van De Zandschulp — Prague CH Round of 16

Prague CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Stan Wawrinka
SUI1
Stan Wawrinka
#117ATP
1678ELO
1613Clay ELO
$657kYTD
$38MCAREER
41 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 24 August 2020
clay
Botic Van De Zandschulp
NED15
Botic Van De Zandschulp
#55ATP
1743ELO
1690Clay ELO
$690kYTD
$6.6MCAREER
30 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLLLLW
Wawrinka S.
6-3 6-3
Van De Zandschulp B.
Wawrinka S.
662
Van De Zandschulp B.
330

Stan Wawrinka defeated Botic Van De Zandschulp 6-3 6-3 in the Prague CH round of 16 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Botic Van De Zandschulp came in ranked #55, but Stan Wawrinka had been the form player, winning 2 of their last 5 on clay. Stan Wawrinka extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2025-11-02AthensR32hardStan Wawrinka2-6 7-6(5) 7-5

Serve vs return

This season
Wawrinka S.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Van De Zandschulp B.

Van De Zandschulp B.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Wawrinka S.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Wawrinka S.Van De Zandschulp B.
—
Serve
26
—
Return
74

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Wawrinka S.Van De Zandschulp B.
1st serve in·Slight edge
57%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
74%
71%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
53%
47%
Service points won·Even
65%
62%
Return points won·Even
35%
38%
Break points saved·Even
63%
60%
Aces / match·Clear edge
7.1
5.6
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.0
3.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (198 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Wawrinka S.Van De Zandschulp B.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
65
77
Break points saved·Even
99
98
Break points won·Dominant
30
68
Deciding sets·Slight edge
71
79
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
90
80

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Wawrinka S.Van De Zandschulp B.
Freshness·Even
95
95

Wawrinka S.: 14 days rest · 1 match (14d) · Van De Zandschulp B.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Wawrinka S.[1]
Karatsev A.
7-626-4
Karatsev A.
Griekspoor T.
6-47-66
Semi-finals
Karatsev A.
Herbert P.[3]
7-57-67
Wawrinka S.[1]
Vrbensky M.
5-76-36-3
Griekspoor T.
Rosol L.
6-47-5
Karatsev A.
Popko D.[16]
7-54-67-5
Quarter-finals
Karatsev A.
Laaksonen H.[7]
7-636-4
Herbert P.[3]
Griekspoor T.
7-55-76-3
Vrbensky M.
Ymer E.
6-23-66-4
Wawrinka S.[1]
Nagal S.[6]
2-66-06-1
Karatsev A.
Wawrinka S.[1]
W/O
Rosol L.
Ofner S.[9]
6-35-77-5
Griekspoor T.
Haase R.[13]
6-36-2
Popko D.[16]
Rinderknech A.[7]
0-67-616-3
R16
Vrbensky M.
Kohlschreiber P.[4]
W/O
Karatsev A.
Gulbis E.[14]
6-36-3
Laaksonen H.[7]
Maden Y.[10]
3-66-46-3
Herbert P.[3]
Kolar Z.
7-632-66-3
Griekspoor T.
Kovalik J.[5]
6-11-66-1
Ymer E.
Machac T.
4-66-36-0
Nagal S.[6]
Lehecka J.
5-77-646-3
Wawrinka S.[1]
Otte O.
3-67-56-1
Griekspoor T.
Stakhovsky S.[12]
6-16-1
Rosol L.
Herbert P.[2]
6-7106-36-4
Ofner S.[9]
Olivo R.
4-67-656-4
Haase R.[13]
Kolar Z.
6-36-2
Rinderknech A.[7]
Masur D.
6-36-3
Popko D.[16]
Maden Y.[4]
7-56-1
Karatsev A.
Gulbis E.[8]
6-26-1
Wawrinka S.[1]
Van De Zandschulp B.[15]
6-36-3
R32
Nagal S.[6]
Clarke J.
6-35-74-1
Herbert P.[3]
Forejtek J.
2-66-46-3
Otte O.
Rinderknech A.[13]
6-26-3
Maden Y.[10]
De Greef A.
6-36-4
Machac T.
Ivashka I.[8]
6-07-5
Kovalik J.[5]
Menendez Maceiras A.
4-66-16-2
Karatsev A.
Vesely J.[2]
6-36-4
Gulbis E.[14]
Paulson A.
7-55-76-4
Laaksonen H.[7]
Satral J.
6-33-67-5
Kolar Z.
Ofner S.[15]
7-677-5
Griekspoor T.
Coppejans K.[11]
5-76-46-3
Ymer E.
Klizan M.[12]
6-22-66-2
Vrbensky M.
Diez S.[16]
7-56-3
Kohlschreiber P.[4]
Moraing M.
6-17-63
Lehecka J.
Rola B.[9]
6-47-64
Wawrinka S.[1]
Safiullin R.
6-14-66-1
Rosol L.
Horansky F.[14]
4-66-26-4
Ofner S.[9]
Forejtek J.
1-67-676-2
Herbert P.[2]
Bemelmans R.
6-26-2
Olivo R.
Klizan M.[6]
6-47-5
Kolar Z.
Chung H.[3]
6-36-1
Haase R.[13]
Machac T.
6-36-4
Stakhovsky S.[12]
Ferreira Silva F.
2-67-647-65
Griekspoor T.
Coppejans K.[5]
7-636-3
Rinderknech A.[7]
Grenier H.
6-46-1
Masur D.
Clarke J.[11]
7-656-1
Popko D.[16]
Otte O.
7-56-3
Maden Y.[4]
Vrbensky M.
6-32-66-4
Gulbis E.[8]
Ymer E.
6-22-66-4
Karatsev A.
Diez S.[10]
6-16-2
Van De Zandschulp B.[15]
Gengel M.
6-36-2
Wawrinka S.[1]
Oliveira G.
6-36-4
R64
Griekspoor T.
Kuznetsov A.
7-647-65
Menendez Maceiras A.
Molleker R.
7-646-3
De Greef A.
Couacaud E.
6-26-0
Machac T.
Stakhovsky S.
7-56-2
Satral J.
Bemelmans R.
7-57-5
Karatsev A.
Haase R.
6-46-2
Paulson A.
Horansky F.
6-32-66-3
Forejtek J.
Van De Zandschulp B.
6-42-66-4
Kolar Z.
Nouza P.
6-26-1
Ymer E.
Karlovskiy E.
6-36-4
Vrbensky M.
Masur D.
7-57-5
Moraing M.
Vatutin A.
5-76-36-2
Clarke J.
Popko D.
7-633-66-3
Lehecka J.
Kuhn N.
6-36-3
Otte O.
Jaziri M.
6-46-0
Safiullin R.
Rosol L.
7-56-2
Vrbensky M.
Krstin P.
6-16-3
Forejtek J.
Vatutin A.
6-46-2
Bemelmans R.
Benchetrit E.
7-56-2
Kolar Z.
De Greef A.
6-46-1
Machac T.
Cerundolo F.
6-24-66-0
Rosol L.
Molleker R.
6-36-747-5
Olivo R.
Robredo T.
4-66-46-1
Ferreira Silva F.
Karlovskiy E.
6-27-5
Griekspoor T.
Klein L.
6-47-65
Grenier H.
Safiullin R.
6-47-64
Masur D.
Lehecka J.
4-66-37-62
Otte O.
Muller A.
6-26-3
Ymer E.
Janvier M.
6-37-64
Karatsev A.
Couacaud E.
3-67-57-5
Gengel M.
Gabashvili T.
6-27-61
Oliveira G.
Jaziri M.
6-46-4