Anett Kontaveit vs Jil Teichmann — Cincinnati Round of 32
Cincinnati · WTA · Round of 32
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 24 August 2020
hard
#119WTA
1687ELO
1631Hard ELO
28 yrs · 170 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLWWWL
Kontaveit A.6-3 6-4
Teichmann J.
Kontaveit A.
662
Teichmann J.
340
Anett Kontaveit defeated Jil Teichmann 6-3 6-4 in the Cincinnati round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Anett Kontaveit came in leading the head-to-head 2–1, defending last year's round of 16. Anett Kontaveit extended the head-to-head to 3–1.
Key context
- Match story: Anett Kontaveit closed it out in two sets, 6–3 6–4.
Head to head
2–1| Date | Tournament | Round | Surface | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-08 | Toronto | R32 | hard | Jil Teichmann | 6-4 6-4 |
| 2022-02-07 | St. Petersburg | R32 | hard | Anett Kontaveit | 6-3 1-6 6-3 |
| 2021-08-30 | US Open | R64 | hard | Anett Kontaveit | 6-4 6-1 |
Serve vs return
This seasonServe advantage — Kontaveit A.
Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About
Statistics
This season1st serve in·Even
62%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
67%
63%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
47%
Service points won·Even
60%
57%
Return points won·Even
45%
44%
Break points saved·Even
57%
54%
Aces / match·Slight edge
3.3
2.3
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.7
3.3
Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (152 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.
Clutch
Under pressureClutch Rating·Dominant
82
50
Break points saved·Clear edge
85
71
Break points won·Slight edge
91
84
Deciding sets·Dominant
90
32
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
77
90
Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About
Conditions
Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Weather
28°CMainly clear
Wind 10 km/hHumidity 64%
Draw
Quarter-finals
Mertens E.[14]
Pegula J.
6-16-3
Konta J.[8]
Sakkari M.[13]
6-46-3
Osaka N.[4]
Kontaveit A.[12]
4-66-27-5
Azarenka V.
Jabeur O.
7-696-2
R16
Jabeur O.
Mchale C.
6-36-0
Azarenka V.
Cornet A.
6-47-5
Kontaveit A.[12]
Bouzkova M.
6-36-3
Sakkari M.[13]
Williams S.[3]
5-77-656-1
Mertens E.[14]
Kudermetova V.
6-26-3
Pegula J.
Sabalenka A.[5]
6-22-66-3
Osaka N.[4]
Yastremska D.[16]
6-36-1
Konta J.[8]
Zvonareva V.
6-46-2
R32
Kudermetova V.
Pliskova K.[1]
7-56-4
Mertens E.[14]
Mladenovic K.
6-16-756-3
Sabalenka A.[5]
Bellis C.
6-716-47-5
Kontaveit A.[12]
Teichmann J.
6-36-4
Bouzkova M.
Kvitova P.[6]
2-67-56-2
Konta J.[8]
Flipkens K.
6-26-0
Zvonareva V.
Siegemund L.
6-16-1
Williams S.[3]
Rus A.
7-663-67-60
Jabeur O.
Keys M.[7]
6-46-1
Mchale C.
Alexandrova E.
6-17-68
Azarenka V.
Garcia C.
6-27-68
Cornet A.
Kenin S.[2]
6-17-67
Pegula J.
Anisimova A.
7-56-2
Sakkari M.[13]
Putintseva Y.
6-47-69
Osaka N.[4]
Muchova K.
6-756-46-2
Yastremska D.[16]
Pera B.
7-654-66-3
R64
Zvonareva V.
Linette M.
1-66-36-1
Kudermetova V.
Tomljanovic A.
5-76-37-5
Mladenovic K.
Sevastova A.
6-36-4
Anisimova A.
Riske Amritraj A.[11]
6-36-3
Pegula J.
Brady J.
7-656-4
Bellis C.
Dodin O.
6-23-67-61
Muchova K.
Li A.
6-46-4
Pera B.
Watson H.
6-13-66-3
Yastremska D.[16]
Williams V.
5-76-27-5
Teichmann J.
Collins D.
6-36-3
Bouzkova M.
Kalinskaya A.
6-17-5
Flipkens K.
Siniakova K.
6-36-3
Siegemund L.
Vondrousova M.[10]
6-36-736-4
Rus A.
Van Uytvanck A.
6-26-3
Jabeur O.
Fernandez L.
0-66-46-3
Mchale C.
Swiatek I.
6-26-4
Alexandrova E.
Rybakina E.[9]
7-57-66
Azarenka V.
Vekic D.[15]
6-26-3
Garcia C.
Stephens S.
6-37-64
Cornet A.
Mcnally C.
6-06-4
Sakkari M.[13]
Gauff C.
6-16-3
Mertens E.[14]
Peterson R.
6-06-2
Putintseva Y.
Zhang S.
6-46-3
Kontaveit A.[12]
Kasatkina D.
6-36-1