Botic Van De Zandschulp vs Marek Gengel — Prague CH Round of 32

Prague CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Botic Van De Zandschulp
NED15
Botic Van De Zandschulp
#55ATP
1743ELO
1690Clay ELO
$690kYTD
$6.6MCAREER
30 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLLLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 24 August 2020
clay
Marek Gengel
CZE
Marek Gengel
#373ATP
1411ELO
1260Clay ELO
30 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWWLWWW
Van De Zandschulp B.
6-3 6-2
Gengel M.
Van De Zandschulp B.
662
Gengel M.
320

Botic Van De Zandschulp defeated Marek Gengel 6-3 6-2 in the Prague CH round of 32 on clay. The result followed the form book — Botic Van De Zandschulp came in ranked #55.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Van De Zandschulp B.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Gengel M.

Gengel M.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Van De Zandschulp B.

Serve advantage — Van De Zandschulp B.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Van De Zandschulp B.Gengel M.
33
Serve
—
74
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Van De Zandschulp B.Gengel M.
1st serve in·Even
62%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
46%
Service points won·Even
62%
60%
Return points won·Even
38%
38%
Break points saved·Even
60%
56%
Aces / match·Slight edge
5.6
4.7
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.9
2.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 151). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Van De Zandschulp B.Gengel M.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
77
11
Break points saved·Dominant
98
35
Break points won·Dominant
68
11
Deciding sets·Dominant
79
53
Tiebreaks·Dominant
81
4

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Van De Zandschulp B.Gengel M.
Freshness·
95
—

Van De Zandschulp B.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Wawrinka S.[1]
Karatsev A.
7-626-4
Karatsev A.
Griekspoor T.
6-47-66
Semi-finals
Karatsev A.
Herbert P.[3]
7-57-67
Wawrinka S.[1]
Vrbensky M.
5-76-36-3
Griekspoor T.
Rosol L.
6-47-5
Karatsev A.
Popko D.[16]
7-54-67-5
Quarter-finals
Karatsev A.
Laaksonen H.[7]
7-636-4
Herbert P.[3]
Griekspoor T.
7-55-76-3
Vrbensky M.
Ymer E.
6-23-66-4
Wawrinka S.[1]
Nagal S.[6]
2-66-06-1
Karatsev A.
Wawrinka S.[1]
W/O
Rosol L.
Ofner S.[9]
6-35-77-5
Griekspoor T.
Haase R.[13]
6-36-2
Popko D.[16]
Rinderknech A.[7]
0-67-616-3
R16
Vrbensky M.
Kohlschreiber P.[4]
W/O
Karatsev A.
Gulbis E.[14]
6-36-3
Laaksonen H.[7]
Maden Y.[10]
3-66-46-3
Herbert P.[3]
Kolar Z.
7-632-66-3
Griekspoor T.
Kovalik J.[5]
6-11-66-1
Ymer E.
Machac T.
4-66-36-0
Nagal S.[6]
Lehecka J.
5-77-646-3
Wawrinka S.[1]
Otte O.
3-67-56-1
Griekspoor T.
Stakhovsky S.[12]
6-16-1
Rosol L.
Herbert P.[2]
6-7106-36-4
Ofner S.[9]
Olivo R.
4-67-656-4
Haase R.[13]
Kolar Z.
6-36-2
Rinderknech A.[7]
Masur D.
6-36-3
Popko D.[16]
Maden Y.[4]
7-56-1
Karatsev A.
Gulbis E.[8]
6-26-1
Wawrinka S.[1]
Van De Zandschulp B.[15]
6-36-3
R32
Nagal S.[6]
Clarke J.
6-35-74-1
Herbert P.[3]
Forejtek J.
2-66-46-3
Otte O.
Rinderknech A.[13]
6-26-3
Maden Y.[10]
De Greef A.
6-36-4
Machac T.
Ivashka I.[8]
6-07-5
Kovalik J.[5]
Menendez Maceiras A.
4-66-16-2
Karatsev A.
Vesely J.[2]
6-36-4
Gulbis E.[14]
Paulson A.
7-55-76-4
Laaksonen H.[7]
Satral J.
6-33-67-5
Kolar Z.
Ofner S.[15]
7-677-5
Griekspoor T.
Coppejans K.[11]
5-76-46-3
Ymer E.
Klizan M.[12]
6-22-66-2
Vrbensky M.
Diez S.[16]
7-56-3
Kohlschreiber P.[4]
Moraing M.
6-17-63
Lehecka J.
Rola B.[9]
6-47-64
Wawrinka S.[1]
Safiullin R.
6-14-66-1
Rosol L.
Horansky F.[14]
4-66-26-4
Ofner S.[9]
Forejtek J.
1-67-676-2
Herbert P.[2]
Bemelmans R.
6-26-2
Olivo R.
Klizan M.[6]
6-47-5
Kolar Z.
Chung H.[3]
6-36-1
Haase R.[13]
Machac T.
6-36-4
Stakhovsky S.[12]
Ferreira Silva F.
2-67-647-65
Griekspoor T.
Coppejans K.[5]
7-636-3
Rinderknech A.[7]
Grenier H.
6-46-1
Masur D.
Clarke J.[11]
7-656-1
Popko D.[16]
Otte O.
7-56-3
Maden Y.[4]
Vrbensky M.
6-32-66-4
Gulbis E.[8]
Ymer E.
6-22-66-4
Karatsev A.
Diez S.[10]
6-16-2
Van De Zandschulp B.[15]
Gengel M.
6-36-2
Wawrinka S.[1]
Oliveira G.
6-36-4
R64
Griekspoor T.
Kuznetsov A.
7-647-65
Menendez Maceiras A.
Molleker R.
7-646-3
De Greef A.
Couacaud E.
6-26-0
Machac T.
Stakhovsky S.
7-56-2
Satral J.
Bemelmans R.
7-57-5
Karatsev A.
Haase R.
6-46-2
Paulson A.
Horansky F.
6-32-66-3
Forejtek J.
Van De Zandschulp B.
6-42-66-4
Kolar Z.
Nouza P.
6-26-1
Ymer E.
Karlovskiy E.
6-36-4
Vrbensky M.
Masur D.
7-57-5
Moraing M.
Vatutin A.
5-76-36-2
Clarke J.
Popko D.
7-633-66-3
Lehecka J.
Kuhn N.
6-36-3
Otte O.
Jaziri M.
6-46-0
Safiullin R.
Rosol L.
7-56-2
Vrbensky M.
Krstin P.
6-16-3
Forejtek J.
Vatutin A.
6-46-2
Bemelmans R.
Benchetrit E.
7-56-2
Kolar Z.
De Greef A.
6-46-1
Machac T.
Cerundolo F.
6-24-66-0
Rosol L.
Molleker R.
6-36-747-5
Olivo R.
Robredo T.
4-66-46-1
Ferreira Silva F.
Karlovskiy E.
6-27-5
Griekspoor T.
Klein L.
6-47-65
Grenier H.
Safiullin R.
6-47-64
Masur D.
Lehecka J.
4-66-37-62
Otte O.
Muller A.
6-26-3
Ymer E.
Janvier M.
6-37-64
Karatsev A.
Couacaud E.
3-67-57-5
Gengel M.
Gabashvili T.
6-27-61
Oliveira G.
Jaziri M.
6-46-4