Coco Gauff vs Ons Jabeur — Lexington Quarter-final

Lexington · WTA · Quarter-final
Coco Gauff
USA
Coco Gauff
#4WTA
2071ELO
2035Hard ELO
$2.9MYTD
$33MCAREER
22 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWLLWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 10 August 2020
hard
TUN8
Ons Jabeur
31 yrs · 167 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWWLLW
Gauff C.
4-6 6-4 6-1
Jabeur O.
Gauff C.
4662
Jabeur O.
6411

Coco Gauff defeated Ons Jabeur 4-6 6-4 6-1 in the Lexington quarter-final on hard. The result followed the form book — Coco Gauff came in leading the head-to-head 5–2. Coco Gauff extended the head-to-head to 6–2.

Key context

Head to head

5–2
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2024-06-17BerlinQFgrassCoco Gauff7-6(9) 0-0 RET
2024-05-27Roland GarrosQFclayCoco Gauff4-6 6-2 6-3
2023-10-30Cancun FinalsRRhardCoco Gauff6-0 6-1
2022-06-13BerlinSFgrassOns Jabeur7-6(4) 6-2
2021-05-31Roland GarrosR16clayCoco Gauff6-3 6-1
2021-04-05Charleston 1QFclayOns Jabeur6-3 6-3
2020-09-14RomeR64clayCoco Gauff6-4 6-3
View full head-to-head →

Serve vs return

This season
Gauff C.serving73% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Jabeur O.

Jabeur O.serving67% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Gauff C.

Serve advantage — Gauff C.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Gauff C.Jabeur O.
25
Serve
—
100
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Gauff C.Jabeur O.
1st serve in·Even
60%
56%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
44%
47%
Service points won·Even
59%
59%
Return points won·Even
48%
45%
Break points saved·Even
56%
57%
Aces / match·Even
3.4
3.4
Double faults / match·Dominant
5.8
2.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Gauff C.Jabeur O.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
99
90
Break points saved·Slight edge
96
90
Break points won·Even
100
96
Deciding sets·Slight edge
100
95
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
99
90

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Gauff C.Jabeur O.
Freshness·
70
—

Gauff C.: 5 days rest · 2 matches, 56 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Brady J.
Teichmann J.
6-36-4
Semi-finals
Teichmann J.
Rogers S.
6-36-2
Brady J.
Gauff C.
6-26-4
Quarter-finals
Rogers S.
Williams S.[1]
1-66-47-65
Teichmann J.
Bellis C.
6-26-4
Gauff C.
Jabeur O.[8]
4-66-46-1
Brady J.
Bouzkova M.
6-16-2
R16
Teichmann J.
Putintseva Y.[5]
6-26-2
Bouzkova M.
Blinkova A.
6-46-2
Brady J.
Linette M.[6]
6-26-3
Williams S.[1]
Williams V.
3-66-36-4
Rogers S.
Fernandez L.
6-27-5
Bellis C.
Pegula J.
6-36-2
Jabeur O.[8]
Govortsova O.
3-66-26-4
Gauff C.
Sabalenka A.[2]
7-644-66-4
R32
Sabalenka A.[2]
Brengle M.
6-16-756-2
Blinkova A.
Ahn K.
2-66-43-1
Linette M.[6]
Davis L.
6-26-3
Govortsova O.
Mattek Sands B.
7-646-1
Williams S.[1]
Pera B.
4-66-46-1
Williams V.
Azarenka V.
6-36-2
Rogers S.
Doi M.
6-44-66-2
Fernandez L.
Stephens S.[7]
6-36-3
Bellis C.
Di Lorenzo F.
6-16-2
Pegula J.
Zvonareva V.
6-15-76-4
Teichmann J.
Kalinskaya A.
6-27-5
Putintseva Y.[5]
Tomljanovic A.
6-06-4
Jabeur O.[8]
Mcnally C.
6-26-4
Gauff C.
Dolehide C.
7-57-5
Bouzkova M.
Konta J.[3]
6-46-4
Brady J.
Watson H.
6-26-1