Venus Williams vs Victoria Azarenka — Lexington Round of 32

Lexington · WTA · Round of 32
Venus Williams
USA
Venus Williams
1654ELO
1617Hard ELO
46 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 10 August 2020
hard
Victoria Azarenka
BLR
Victoria Azarenka
#449WTA
1875ELO
1839Hard ELO
36 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWWLWLW
Williams V.
6-3 6-2
Azarenka V.
Williams V.
662
Azarenka V.
320

Venus Williams defeated Victoria Azarenka 6-3 6-2 in the Lexington round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Venus Williams came in leading the head-to-head 5–3. Venus Williams extended the head-to-head to 6–3.

Key context

Head to head

5–3
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2020-09-14RomeR64clayVictoria Azarenka7-6(7) 6-2
2018-12-31AucklandR32hardVenus Williams6-3 1-6 6-3
2015-05-04MadridR64clayVictoria Azarenka6-3 7-5
2015-02-23DohaSFhardVictoria Azarenka2-6 6-2 6-4
2014-07-28StanfordR16hardVenus Williams6-4 7-6(1)
2013-09-23TokyoR32hardVenus Williams6-2 6-4
2010-02-15DubaiFhardVenus Williams6-3 7-5
2008-08-11OlympicsR16hardVenus Williams6-3 6-2
View full head-to-head →

Serve vs return

This season
Williams V.serving57% hold

wins 53% of points on serve vs Azarenka V.

Azarenka V.serving80% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Williams V.

Serve advantage — Azarenka V.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Williams V.Azarenka V.
1st serve in·Even
59%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
63%
66%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
37%
44%
Service points won·Slight edge
53%
58%
Return points won·Slight edge
40%
46%
Break points saved·Even
53%
57%
Aces / match·Slight edge
3.4
2.8
Double faults / match·Clear edge
5.6
4.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (46 vs 195). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Williams V.Azarenka V.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
54
91
Break points saved·Slight edge
83
94
Break points won·Clear edge
83
99
Deciding sets·Dominant
30
96
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
86
77

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Brady J.
Teichmann J.
6-36-4
Semi-finals
Teichmann J.
Rogers S.
6-36-2
Brady J.
Gauff C.
6-26-4
Quarter-finals
Rogers S.
Williams S.[1]
1-66-47-65
Teichmann J.
Bellis C.
6-26-4
Gauff C.
Jabeur O.[8]
4-66-46-1
Brady J.
Bouzkova M.
6-16-2
R16
Teichmann J.
Putintseva Y.[5]
6-26-2
Bouzkova M.
Blinkova A.
6-46-2
Brady J.
Linette M.[6]
6-26-3
Williams S.[1]
Williams V.
3-66-36-4
Rogers S.
Fernandez L.
6-27-5
Bellis C.
Pegula J.
6-36-2
Jabeur O.[8]
Govortsova O.
3-66-26-4
Gauff C.
Sabalenka A.[2]
7-644-66-4
R32
Sabalenka A.[2]
Brengle M.
6-16-756-2
Blinkova A.
Ahn K.
2-66-43-1
Linette M.[6]
Davis L.
6-26-3
Govortsova O.
Mattek Sands B.
7-646-1
Williams S.[1]
Pera B.
4-66-46-1
Williams V.
Azarenka V.
6-36-2
Rogers S.
Doi M.
6-44-66-2
Fernandez L.
Stephens S.[7]
6-36-3
Bellis C.
Di Lorenzo F.
6-16-2
Pegula J.
Zvonareva V.
6-15-76-4
Teichmann J.
Kalinskaya A.
6-27-5
Putintseva Y.[5]
Tomljanovic A.
6-06-4
Jabeur O.[8]
Mcnally C.
6-26-4
Gauff C.
Dolehide C.
7-57-5
Bouzkova M.
Konta J.[3]
6-46-4
Brady J.
Watson H.
6-26-1