Mackenzie Mcdonald vs Blake Mott — Indian Wells CH Round of 64

Indian Wells CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 64
Mackenzie Mcdonald
USA
Mackenzie Mcdonald
#140ATP
1606ELO
1604Hard ELO
$240kYTD
$7.2MCAREER
31 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWLWLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 2 March 2020
hard
AUS
Blake Mott
#1565ATP
30 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLLWWL
Mcdonald M.
6-0 6-4
Mott B.
Mcdonald M.
662
Mott B.
040

Mackenzie Mcdonald defeated Blake Mott 6-0 6-4 in the Indian Wells CH round of 64 on hard. The result followed the form book — Mackenzie Mcdonald came in ranked #140.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Mcdonald M.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Mott B.

Mott B.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Mcdonald M.

Serve advantage — Mcdonald M.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Mcdonald M.Mott B.
25
Serve
—
10
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Mcdonald M.Mott B.
1st serve in·Even
65%
68%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
68%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
52%
45%
Service points won·Even
64%
61%
Return points won·Even
38%
38%
Break points saved·Slight edge
61%
52%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.8
2.7
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.3
4.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 47). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Mcdonald M.Mott B.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
56
1
Break points saved·Dominant
96
16
Break points won·Dominant
66
24
Deciding sets·Clear edge
45
25
Tiebreaks·
44
—

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Mcdonald M.Mott B.
Freshness·
92
—

Mcdonald M.: 6 days rest · 1 match, 16 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Johnson S.[5]
Sock J.
6-46-4
Semi-finals
Johnson S.[5]
Krueger M.
6-46-4
Sock J.
Nakashima B.
6-756-36-4
Quarter-finals
Johnson S.[5]
Rubin N.
6-36-3
Krueger M.
Barrere G.[9]
6-47-65
Nakashima B.
Giron M.[14]
7-623-66-2
Sock J.
Kudla D.[11]
7-655-76-4
R16
Krueger M.
Korda S.
6-26-1
Barrere G.[9]
Tiafoe F.[8]
4-66-27-64
Nakashima B.
Caruso S.[10]
6-46-3
Kudla D.[11]
Sinner J.[6]
6-36-746-2
Sock J.
Donskoy E.[13]
6-44-67-63
Johnson S.[5]
Daniel T.[12]
7-636-2
Rubin N.
Sarmiento R.
6-36-1
Giron M.[14]
Marcora R.
7-646-1
R32
Rubin N.
Pouille L.[2]
6-47-65
Daniel T.[12]
Mcdonald M.
7-57-66
Johnson S.[5]
Polmans M.
6-13-66-2
Krueger M.
Albot R.[4]
0-66-46-4
Barrere G.[9]
Zverev M.
6-33-67-5
Nakashima B.
Sugita Y.[7]
6-36-2
Caruso S.[10]
Kwiatkowski T.
6-46-2
Giron M.[14]
Peniston R.
6-27-64
Sinner J.[6]
Verbeek S.
6-06-1
Sock J.
Humbert U.[1]
7-656-4
Sarmiento R.
Gojowczyk P.[16]
4-66-36-2
Korda S.
Oconnell C.[15]
6-16-1
Tiafoe F.[8]
Mmoh M.
6-46-3
Kudla D.[11]
Janvier M.
6-26-1
Donskoy E.[13]
Redlicki M.
7-646-0
Marcora R.
Arneodo R.
4-66-17-68
R64
Mmoh M.
Santillan A.
6-06-3
Polmans M.
Nanda G.
6-26-3
Krueger M.
Sela D.
0-67-647-5
Redlicki M.
Li Z.
6-26-2
Mcdonald M.
Mott B.
6-06-4
Rubin N.
Petrovic D.
3-67-646-1
Verbeek S.
Cressy M.
7-646-3
Sarmiento R.
Copil M.
6-36-3
Zverev M.
Aragone J.
5-76-07-66
Korda S.
Holt B.
6-36-1
Nakashima B.
Broady L.
6-26-3
Kwiatkowski T.
Chung H.
7-626-2
Peniston R.
Smith K.
7-656-4
Marcora R.
Brymer G.
6-46-3
Janvier M.
Klahn B.
6-46-4
Sock J.
Uchida K.
6-15-76-2