Jason Kubler vs Juan Pablo Ficovich — Monterrey CH Round of 64

Monterrey CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 64
AUS
Jason Kubler
#468ATP
1685ELO
1635Hard ELO
33 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWWWWWLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 2 March 2020
hard
Juan Pablo Ficovich
ARG
Juan Pablo Ficovich
#224ATP
1415ELO
1419Hard ELO
$100kYTD
$984kCAREER
29 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWLLLL
Kubler J.
7-6 6-3
Ficovich J.
Kubler J.
7762
Ficovich J.
6530

Jason Kubler defeated Juan Pablo Ficovich 7-6 6-3 in the Monterrey CH round of 64 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Jason Kubler closed it out in two sets, 7–6 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Kubler J.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Ficovich J.

Ficovich J.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Kubler J.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Kubler J.Ficovich J.
1st serve in·Even
62%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
51%
Service points won·Even
64%
62%
Return points won·Even
38%
38%
Break points saved·Even
61%
59%
Aces / match·Slight edge
5.7
4.3
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.3
2.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (184 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Kubler J.Ficovich J.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
59
16
Break points saved·Clear edge
90
76
Break points won·Dominant
46
9
Deciding sets·Dominant
79
27
Tiebreaks·Dominant
37
5

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Kubler J.Ficovich J.
Freshness·
—
86

Ficovich J.: 6 days rest · 1 match, 33 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Mannarino A.[1]
Vukic A.
6-16-3
Semi-finals
Mannarino A.[1]
Blanch U.
6-26-4
Vukic A.
Escobedo E.[16]
6-737-657-64
Quarter-finals
Escobedo E.[16]
Jung J.[6]
6-26-2
Blanch U.
Andujar P.[3]
3-67-647-5
Mannarino A.[1]
Smith J.
6-46-1
Vukic A.
King K.
6-06-3
R16
Vukic A.
Tomic B.[15]
6-46-4
Jung J.[6]
Giustino L.[9]
6-16-2
Blanch U.
Lorenzi P.[7]
6-45-76-4
Andujar P.[3]
Harris A.[13]
6-26-2
Smith J.
Moroni G.
7-676-1
Mannarino A.[1]
Polansky P.[14]
6-16-2
Escobedo E.[16]
Berankis R.[4]
7-657-65
King K.
Clezar G.
7-644-66-4
R32
Jung J.[6]
Altamirano C.
7-626-767-66
King K.
Schnur B.[12]
6-46-747-5
Clezar G.
Coria F.[5]
6-16-757-65
Berankis R.[4]
Mochizuki S.
7-56-4
Escobedo E.[16]
Kubler J.
6-16-2
Giustino L.[9]
Eubanks C.
3-66-46-4
Lorenzi P.[7]
Ward J.
6-36-726-3
Harris A.[13]
Caruana L.
6-36-1
Moroni G.
Gaio F.[8]
6-46-746-2
Smith J.
Diez S.[10]
6-16-0
Polansky P.[14]
King E.
6-26-3
Blanch U.
Troicki V.[11]
7-634-66-3
Mannarino A.[1]
Bourchier H.
6-26-4
Tomic B.[15]
Menendez Maceiras A.
6-36-726-3
Andujar P.[3]
Young D.
6-36-1
Vukic A.
Lopez F.[2]
6-33-66-3
R64
Vukic A.
Lenz J.
6-36-3
Menendez Maceiras A.
Patino L.
6-06-4
King K.
Oliveira G.
6-16-2
Clezar G.
Mejia N.
6-16-4
Mochizuki S.
Hernandez Serrano J.
6-34-66-2
Kubler J.
Ficovich J.
7-656-3
Eubanks C.
Luz O.
7-623-67-5
Altamirano C.
Gutierrez O.
6-36-4
Ward J.
Blancaneaux G.
6-46-2
Caruana L.
Velotti A.
1-66-46-3
King E.
Etcheverry T.
6-46-4
Bourchier H.
Altmaier D.
2-66-46-2
Moroni G.
Purcell M.
6-33-0
Blanch U.
Gomez Herrera C.
6-36-1
Smith J.
Cossu M.
6-16-0
Young D.
Franco Descotte M.
7-56-3