Brandon Nakashima vs Salvatore Caruso — Indian Wells CH Round of 16

Indian Wells CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Brandon Nakashima
USA
Brandon Nakashima
#32ATP
1839ELO
1788Hard ELO
$990kYTD
$7.9MCAREER
24 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 2 March 2020
hard
ITA10
Salvatore Caruso
33 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWLWLWL
Nakashima B.
6-4 6-3
Caruso S.
Nakashima B.
662
Caruso S.
430

Brandon Nakashima defeated Salvatore Caruso 6-4 6-3 in the Indian Wells CH round of 16 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Nakashima B.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Caruso S.

Caruso S.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Nakashima B.

Serve advantage — Nakashima B.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Nakashima B.Caruso S.
61
Serve
—
23
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Nakashima B.Caruso S.
1st serve in·Slight edge
66%
60%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
75%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
54%
50%
Service points won·Slight edge
68%
59%
Return points won·Even
35%
39%
Break points saved·Slight edge
66%
57%
Aces / match·Dominant
8.5
2.7
Double faults / match·Clear edge
1.2
2.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 194). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Nakashima B.Caruso S.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
56
41
Break points saved·Dominant
99
65
Break points won·Clear edge
13
30
Deciding sets·Clear edge
64
80
Tiebreaks·Dominant
89
18

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Nakashima B.Caruso S.
Freshness·
88
—

Nakashima B.: 11 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Johnson S.[5]
Sock J.
6-46-4
Semi-finals
Johnson S.[5]
Krueger M.
6-46-4
Sock J.
Nakashima B.
6-756-36-4
Quarter-finals
Johnson S.[5]
Rubin N.
6-36-3
Krueger M.
Barrere G.[9]
6-47-65
Nakashima B.
Giron M.[14]
7-623-66-2
Sock J.
Kudla D.[11]
7-655-76-4
R16
Krueger M.
Korda S.
6-26-1
Barrere G.[9]
Tiafoe F.[8]
4-66-27-64
Nakashima B.
Caruso S.[10]
6-46-3
Kudla D.[11]
Sinner J.[6]
6-36-746-2
Sock J.
Donskoy E.[13]
6-44-67-63
Johnson S.[5]
Daniel T.[12]
7-636-2
Rubin N.
Sarmiento R.
6-36-1
Giron M.[14]
Marcora R.
7-646-1
R32
Rubin N.
Pouille L.[2]
6-47-65
Daniel T.[12]
Mcdonald M.
7-57-66
Johnson S.[5]
Polmans M.
6-13-66-2
Krueger M.
Albot R.[4]
0-66-46-4
Barrere G.[9]
Zverev M.
6-33-67-5
Nakashima B.
Sugita Y.[7]
6-36-2
Caruso S.[10]
Kwiatkowski T.
6-46-2
Giron M.[14]
Peniston R.
6-27-64
Sinner J.[6]
Verbeek S.
6-06-1
Sock J.
Humbert U.[1]
7-656-4
Sarmiento R.
Gojowczyk P.[16]
4-66-36-2
Korda S.
Oconnell C.[15]
6-16-1
Tiafoe F.[8]
Mmoh M.
6-46-3
Kudla D.[11]
Janvier M.
6-26-1
Donskoy E.[13]
Redlicki M.
7-646-0
Marcora R.
Arneodo R.
4-66-17-68
R64
Mmoh M.
Santillan A.
6-06-3
Polmans M.
Nanda G.
6-26-3
Krueger M.
Sela D.
0-67-647-5
Redlicki M.
Li Z.
6-26-2
Mcdonald M.
Mott B.
6-06-4
Rubin N.
Petrovic D.
3-67-646-1
Verbeek S.
Cressy M.
7-646-3
Sarmiento R.
Copil M.
6-36-3
Zverev M.
Aragone J.
5-76-07-66
Korda S.
Holt B.
6-36-1
Nakashima B.
Broady L.
6-26-3
Kwiatkowski T.
Chung H.
7-626-2
Peniston R.
Smith K.
7-656-4
Marcora R.
Brymer G.
6-46-3
Janvier M.
Klahn B.
6-46-4
Sock J.
Uchida K.
6-15-76-2