Ulises Blanch vs Viktor Troicki — Monterrey CH Round of 32

Monterrey CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
USA
Ulises Blanch
#1661ATP
28 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLWWWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 2 March 2020
hard
SRB11
Viktor Troicki
40 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWWWWLW
Blanch U.
7-6 4-6 6-3
Troicki V.
Blanch U.
77462
Troicki V.
63631

Ulises Blanch defeated Viktor Troicki 7-6 4-6 6-3 in the Monterrey CH round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Viktor Troicki came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Ulises Blanch claimed a first win over Viktor Troicki in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

  • Match story: Ulises Blanch closed it out in three sets, 7–6 4–6 6–3.

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2021-01-10Doha Aus Open QualiesQ2hardViktor Troicki7-5 6-3

Serve vs return

This season
Blanch U.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Troicki V.

Troicki V.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Blanch U.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Blanch U.Troicki V.
1st serve in·Slight edge
58%
66%
1st serve points won·Even
74%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
47%
Service points won·Even
64%
63%
Return points won·Even
35%
37%
Break points saved·Slight edge
63%
56%
Aces / match·Slight edge
6.9
6.2
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.6
1.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (181 vs 42). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Blanch U.Troicki V.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
19
62
Break points saved·Slight edge
83
91
Break points won·Dominant
2
27
Deciding sets·Dominant
19
86
Tiebreaks·Dominant
37
70

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Mannarino A.[1]
Vukic A.
6-16-3
Semi-finals
Mannarino A.[1]
Blanch U.
6-26-4
Vukic A.
Escobedo E.[16]
6-737-657-64
Quarter-finals
Escobedo E.[16]
Jung J.[6]
6-26-2
Blanch U.
Andujar P.[3]
3-67-647-5
Mannarino A.[1]
Smith J.
6-46-1
Vukic A.
King K.
6-06-3
R16
Vukic A.
Tomic B.[15]
6-46-4
Jung J.[6]
Giustino L.[9]
6-16-2
Blanch U.
Lorenzi P.[7]
6-45-76-4
Andujar P.[3]
Harris A.[13]
6-26-2
Smith J.
Moroni G.
7-676-1
Mannarino A.[1]
Polansky P.[14]
6-16-2
Escobedo E.[16]
Berankis R.[4]
7-657-65
King K.
Clezar G.
7-644-66-4
R32
Jung J.[6]
Altamirano C.
7-626-767-66
King K.
Schnur B.[12]
6-46-747-5
Clezar G.
Coria F.[5]
6-16-757-65
Berankis R.[4]
Mochizuki S.
7-56-4
Escobedo E.[16]
Kubler J.
6-16-2
Giustino L.[9]
Eubanks C.
3-66-46-4
Lorenzi P.[7]
Ward J.
6-36-726-3
Harris A.[13]
Caruana L.
6-36-1
Moroni G.
Gaio F.[8]
6-46-746-2
Smith J.
Diez S.[10]
6-16-0
Polansky P.[14]
King E.
6-26-3
Blanch U.
Troicki V.[11]
7-634-66-3
Mannarino A.[1]
Bourchier H.
6-26-4
Tomic B.[15]
Menendez Maceiras A.
6-36-726-3
Andujar P.[3]
Young D.
6-36-1
Vukic A.
Lopez F.[2]
6-33-66-3
R64
Vukic A.
Lenz J.
6-36-3
Menendez Maceiras A.
Patino L.
6-06-4
King K.
Oliveira G.
6-16-2
Clezar G.
Mejia N.
6-16-4
Mochizuki S.
Hernandez Serrano J.
6-34-66-2
Kubler J.
Ficovich J.
7-656-3
Eubanks C.
Luz O.
7-623-67-5
Altamirano C.
Gutierrez O.
6-36-4
Ward J.
Blancaneaux G.
6-46-2
Caruana L.
Velotti A.
1-66-46-3
King E.
Etcheverry T.
6-46-4
Bourchier H.
Altmaier D.
2-66-46-2
Moroni G.
Purcell M.
6-33-0
Blanch U.
Gomez Herrera C.
6-36-1
Smith J.
Cossu M.
6-16-0
Young D.
Franco Descotte M.
7-56-3