Ulises Blanch vs Paolo Lorenzi — Monterrey CH Round of 16

Monterrey CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
USA
Ulises Blanch
#1661ATP
28 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLWWWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 2 March 2020
hard
ITA7
Paolo Lorenzi
44 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLLLLL
Blanch U.
6-4 5-7 6-4
Lorenzi P.
Blanch U.
6562
Lorenzi P.
4741

Ulises Blanch defeated Paolo Lorenzi 6-4 5-7 6-4 in the Monterrey CH round of 16 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Paolo Lorenzi came in defending last year's round of 32.

Key context

  • Match story: Ulises Blanch edged a tight contest from start to finish — 6–4 5–7 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Blanch U.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Lorenzi P.

Lorenzi P.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Blanch U.

Serve advantage — Blanch U.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Blanch U.Lorenzi P.
1st serve in·Even
58%
58%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
74%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
46%
Service points won·Slight edge
64%
58%
Return points won·Even
35%
36%
Break points saved·Slight edge
63%
58%
Aces / match·Dominant
6.9
3.3
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.6
3.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (181 vs 47). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Blanch U.Lorenzi P.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
19
44
Break points saved·Even
83
84
Break points won·Clear edge
2
21
Deciding sets·Dominant
19
67
Tiebreaks·Even
37
34

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Mannarino A.[1]
Vukic A.
6-16-3
Semi-finals
Mannarino A.[1]
Blanch U.
6-26-4
Vukic A.
Escobedo E.[16]
6-737-657-64
Quarter-finals
Escobedo E.[16]
Jung J.[6]
6-26-2
Blanch U.
Andujar P.[3]
3-67-647-5
Mannarino A.[1]
Smith J.
6-46-1
Vukic A.
King K.
6-06-3
R16
Vukic A.
Tomic B.[15]
6-46-4
Jung J.[6]
Giustino L.[9]
6-16-2
Blanch U.
Lorenzi P.[7]
6-45-76-4
Andujar P.[3]
Harris A.[13]
6-26-2
Smith J.
Moroni G.
7-676-1
Mannarino A.[1]
Polansky P.[14]
6-16-2
Escobedo E.[16]
Berankis R.[4]
7-657-65
King K.
Clezar G.
7-644-66-4
R32
Jung J.[6]
Altamirano C.
7-626-767-66
King K.
Schnur B.[12]
6-46-747-5
Clezar G.
Coria F.[5]
6-16-757-65
Berankis R.[4]
Mochizuki S.
7-56-4
Escobedo E.[16]
Kubler J.
6-16-2
Giustino L.[9]
Eubanks C.
3-66-46-4
Lorenzi P.[7]
Ward J.
6-36-726-3
Harris A.[13]
Caruana L.
6-36-1
Moroni G.
Gaio F.[8]
6-46-746-2
Smith J.
Diez S.[10]
6-16-0
Polansky P.[14]
King E.
6-26-3
Blanch U.
Troicki V.[11]
7-634-66-3
Mannarino A.[1]
Bourchier H.
6-26-4
Tomic B.[15]
Menendez Maceiras A.
6-36-726-3
Andujar P.[3]
Young D.
6-36-1
Vukic A.
Lopez F.[2]
6-33-66-3
R64
Vukic A.
Lenz J.
6-36-3
Menendez Maceiras A.
Patino L.
6-06-4
King K.
Oliveira G.
6-16-2
Clezar G.
Mejia N.
6-16-4
Mochizuki S.
Hernandez Serrano J.
6-34-66-2
Kubler J.
Ficovich J.
7-656-3
Eubanks C.
Luz O.
7-623-67-5
Altamirano C.
Gutierrez O.
6-36-4
Ward J.
Blancaneaux G.
6-46-2
Caruana L.
Velotti A.
1-66-46-3
King E.
Etcheverry T.
6-46-4
Bourchier H.
Altmaier D.
2-66-46-2
Moroni G.
Purcell M.
6-33-0
Blanch U.
Gomez Herrera C.
6-36-1
Smith J.
Cossu M.
6-16-0
Young D.
Franco Descotte M.
7-56-3