Casper Ruud vs Albert Ramos — Santiago Semi-final

Santiago · ATP · Semi-final
Casper Ruud
NOR2
Casper Ruud
#13ATP
1983ELO
1973Clay ELO
$2.0MYTD
$29MCAREER
27 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWLWWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 24 February 2020
clay
ESP3
Albert Ramos
1558ELO
1526Clay ELO
38 yrs · 188 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLLLLLL
Ruud C.
7-6 6-2
Ramos A.
Ruud C.
7762
Ramos A.
6520

Casper Ruud defeated Albert Ramos 7-6 6-2 in the Santiago semi-final on clay. Casper Ruud extended the head-to-head to 5–4.

Key context

  • Match story: Casper Ruud closed it out in two sets, 7–6 6–2.

Head to head

4–4
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2025-05-26Roland GarrosR128clayCasper Ruud6-3 6-4 6-2
2024-01-15Australian OpenR128hardCasper Ruud6-1 6-3 6-1
2022-07-18GstaadSFclayCasper Ruud6-2 6-0
2022-06-27WimbledonR128grassCasper Ruud7-6(1) 7-6(9) 6-2
2019-07-29KitzbuhelSFclayAlbert Ramos7-5 6-4
2019-05-06Madrid MastersQ2clayAlbert Ramos2-6 7-6(3) 6-1
2018-05-28Roland GarrosR64clayAlbert Ramos6-4 6-2 6-4
2017-04-24BarcelonaR32clayAlbert Ramos7-6(6) 6-4
View full head-to-head →

Serve vs return

This season
Ruud C.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Ramos A.

Ramos A.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Ruud C.

Serve advantage — Ruud C.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Ruud C.Ramos A.
58
Serve
—
70
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Ruud C.Ramos A.
1st serve in·Even
65%
65%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
72%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
54%
51%
Service points won·Slight edge
66%
60%
Return points won·Even
37%
38%
Break points saved·Slight edge
66%
61%
Aces / match·Dominant
5.7
2.1
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.3
1.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Ruud C.Ramos A.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
91
59
Break points saved·Even
99
95
Break points won·Dominant
75
49
Deciding sets·Clear edge
99
80
Tiebreaks·Dominant
97
22

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Ruud C.Ramos A.
Freshness·
100
—

Ruud C.: 15 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Weather
22°CClear
Wind 11 km/hHumidity 44%
Final
Seyboth Wild T.
Ruud C.[2]
7-54-66-3
Semi-finals
Seyboth Wild T.
Olivo R.
6-16-3
Ruud C.[2]
Ramos A.[3]
7-656-2
Quarter-finals
Olivo R.
Dellien H.[6]
3-67-657-5
Ramos A.[3]
Monteiro T.[8]
6-46-4
Ruud C.[2]
Delbonis F.[7]
7-57-5
Seyboth Wild T.
Garin C.[1]
7-610-0
R16
Garin C.[1]
Davidovich Fokina A.
6-20-67-64
Seyboth Wild T.
Londero J.[5]
7-676-4
Olivo R.
Cuevas P.[4]
5-77-657-68
Dellien H.[6]
Barrios Vera T.
6-37-62
Monteiro T.[8]
Carballes Baena R.
6-16-4
Delbonis F.[7]
Caruso S.
7-616-3
Ramos A.[3]
Varillas J.
7-636-2
Ruud C.[2]
Tabilo A.
6-47-5
R32
Monteiro T.[8]
Mayer L.
6-706-36-4
Varillas J.
Horansky F.
6-46-2
Delbonis F.[7]
Klizan M.
6-17-65
Caruso S.
Kovalik J.
6-26-3
Tabilo A.
Lorenzi P.
6-36-4
Seyboth Wild T.
Bagnis F.
6-13-66-1
Davidovich Fokina A.
Martin A.
2-67-656-3
Londero J.[5]
Coria F.
6-46-2
Olivo R.
Sousa P.
4-66-36-4
Barrios Vera T.
Taberner C.
4-66-46-2
Dellien H.[6]
Cecchinato M.
6-31-66-3
Carballes Baena R.
Munar J.
6-44-66-4