Alex Molcan vs Botic Van De Zandschulp — Pau CH Round of 32

Pau CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Alex Molcan
SVK
Alex Molcan
#101ATP
1742ELO
1653Hard ELO
$295kYTD
$2.7MCAREER
28 yrs · 178 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLWWWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 24 February 2020
hard
Botic Van De Zandschulp
NED15
Botic Van De Zandschulp
#55ATP
1743ELO
1711Hard ELO
$690kYTD
$6.6MCAREER
30 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLWLWLLLLL
Molcan A.
7-6 4-6 7-5
Van De Zandschulp B.
Molcan A.
77472
Van De Zandschulp B.
65651

Alex Molcan defeated Botic Van De Zandschulp 7-6 4-6 7-5 in the Pau CH round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Botic Van De Zandschulp came in ranked #55. Alex Molcan extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2022-04-04MarrakechQFclayAlex Molcan4-6 6-3 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Molcan A.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Van De Zandschulp B.

Van De Zandschulp B.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Molcan A.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Molcan A.Van De Zandschulp B.
—
Serve
41
—
Return
44

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Molcan A.Van De Zandschulp B.
1st serve in·Even
64%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
67%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
47%
Service points won·Even
61%
62%
Return points won·Even
40%
38%
Break points saved·Even
58%
60%
Aces / match·Clear edge
2.9
5.6
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.4
3.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Molcan A.Van De Zandschulp B.
Clutch Rating·Even
79
77
Break points saved·Slight edge
90
98
Break points won·Slight edge
61
68
Deciding sets·Clear edge
91
79
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
91
80

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Molcan A.Van De Zandschulp B.
Freshness·Even
93
95

Molcan A.: 12 days rest · 2 matches (14d) · Van De Zandschulp B.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Gulbis E.
Janowicz J.
6-36-4
Semi-finals
Janowicz J.
Vesely J.[1]
6-46-767-67
Gulbis E.
Gabashvili T.
6-36-746-1
Quarter-finals
Gabashvili T.
Bonzi B.
6-42-67-64
Vesely J.[1]
Mayot H.
7-637-65
Gulbis E.
Halys Q.[12]
6-726-46-2
Janowicz J.
Grenier H.
6-36-3
R16
Grenier H.
Couacaud E.[16]
7-647-64
Vesely J.[1]
Lestienne C.[13]
6-47-61
Mayot H.
Gaston H.
6-10-0
Gulbis E.
Molcan A.
6-16-736-4
Halys Q.[12]
Lacko L.[8]
7-626-2
Bonzi B.
Kotov P.
6-46-0
Gabashvili T.
Marchenko I.
6-45-77-5
Janowicz J.
Giustino L.[7]
6-46-756-3
R32
Gabashvili T.
Stakhovsky S.[6]
7-616-2
Halys Q.[12]
Viola M.
6-16-2
Gulbis E.
Gombos N.[2]
7-677-61
Giustino L.[7]
Gojo B.
7-667-64
Mayot H.
Haase R.[9]
7-657-63
Molcan A.
Van De Zandschulp B.[15]
7-654-67-5
Lacko L.[8]
Mukund S.
6-47-63
Kotov P.
Hoang A.[4]
6-45-76-2
Bonzi B.
Benchetrit E.[14]
7-56-3
Marchenko I.
Trungelliti M.[11]
2-67-56-1
Couacaud E.[16]
Moraing M.
6-36-4
Grenier H.
Nagal S.[3]
6-12-66-3
Gaston H.
Maden Y.[5]
1-66-46-4
Vesely J.[1]
Bourgue M.
6-46-796-3
Lestienne C.[13]
Reboul F.
7-56-3
Janowicz J.
Janvier M.[10]
6-46-4
R64
Moraing M.
Wu T.
6-06-0
Grenier H.
Karlovskiy E.
6-37-64
Gaston H.
Karatsev A.
6-31-66-1
Mayot H.
Roumane R.
6-16-1
Bourgue M.
Vavassori A.
7-656-3
Gulbis E.
Borg L.
6-26-3
Molcan A.
Moriya H.
6-26-736-4
Kotov P.
Lamasine T.
2-67-676-4
Bonzi B.
Tseng C.
6-36-2
Marchenko I.
Bachinger M.
3-67-6106-4
Gabashvili T.
Miedler L.
6-47-63
Gojo B.
Kavcic B.
6-34-67-64
Mukund S.
De Greef A.
6-757-637-62
Viola M.
Zapata Miralles B.
6-36-4
Reboul F.
Baldi F.
6-47-5
Janowicz J.
Kolar Z.
6-47-5