Matteo Viola vs Bernabe Zapata Miralles — Pau CH Round of 64

Pau CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 64
ITA
Matteo Viola
39 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 24 February 2020
hard
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
ESP
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
1413ELO
1366Hard ELO
29 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLL
Viola M.
6-3 6-4
Zapata Miralles B.
Viola M.
662
Zapata Miralles B.
340

Matteo Viola defeated Bernabe Zapata Miralles 6-3 6-4 in the Pau CH round of 64 on hard. The result followed the form book — Matteo Viola came in leading the head-to-head 1–0, defending last year's round of 64. Matteo Viola extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

  • Match story: Matteo Viola closed it out in two sets, 6–3 6–4.

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2021-03-22Miami MastersQ1hardMatteo Viola7-6(2) 6-2

Serve vs return

This season
Viola M.serving63% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Zapata Miralles B.

Zapata Miralles B.serving66% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Viola M.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Viola M.Zapata Miralles B.
1st serve in·Even
65%
67%
1st serve points won·Even
63%
63%
2nd serve points won·Even
46%
47%
Service points won·Even
57%
57%
Return points won·Even
40%
41%
Break points saved·Even
54%
55%
Aces / match·Even
1.5
1.6
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.6
2.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (94 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Viola M.Zapata Miralles B.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
8
49
Break points saved·Dominant
20
74
Break points won·Dominant
25
80
Deciding sets·Dominant
15
56
Tiebreaks·Dominant
70
3

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Gulbis E.
Janowicz J.
6-36-4
Semi-finals
Janowicz J.
Vesely J.[1]
6-46-767-67
Gulbis E.
Gabashvili T.
6-36-746-1
Quarter-finals
Gabashvili T.
Bonzi B.
6-42-67-64
Vesely J.[1]
Mayot H.
7-637-65
Gulbis E.
Halys Q.[12]
6-726-46-2
Janowicz J.
Grenier H.
6-36-3
R16
Grenier H.
Couacaud E.[16]
7-647-64
Vesely J.[1]
Lestienne C.[13]
6-47-61
Mayot H.
Gaston H.
6-10-0
Gulbis E.
Molcan A.
6-16-736-4
Halys Q.[12]
Lacko L.[8]
7-626-2
Bonzi B.
Kotov P.
6-46-0
Gabashvili T.
Marchenko I.
6-45-77-5
Janowicz J.
Giustino L.[7]
6-46-756-3
R32
Gabashvili T.
Stakhovsky S.[6]
7-616-2
Halys Q.[12]
Viola M.
6-16-2
Gulbis E.
Gombos N.[2]
7-677-61
Giustino L.[7]
Gojo B.
7-667-64
Mayot H.
Haase R.[9]
7-657-63
Molcan A.
Van De Zandschulp B.[15]
7-654-67-5
Lacko L.[8]
Mukund S.
6-47-63
Kotov P.
Hoang A.[4]
6-45-76-2
Bonzi B.
Benchetrit E.[14]
7-56-3
Marchenko I.
Trungelliti M.[11]
2-67-56-1
Couacaud E.[16]
Moraing M.
6-36-4
Grenier H.
Nagal S.[3]
6-12-66-3
Gaston H.
Maden Y.[5]
1-66-46-4
Vesely J.[1]
Bourgue M.
6-46-796-3
Lestienne C.[13]
Reboul F.
7-56-3
Janowicz J.
Janvier M.[10]
6-46-4
R64
Moraing M.
Wu T.
6-06-0
Grenier H.
Karlovskiy E.
6-37-64
Gaston H.
Karatsev A.
6-31-66-1
Mayot H.
Roumane R.
6-16-1
Bourgue M.
Vavassori A.
7-656-3
Gulbis E.
Borg L.
6-26-3
Molcan A.
Moriya H.
6-26-736-4
Kotov P.
Lamasine T.
2-67-676-4
Bonzi B.
Tseng C.
6-36-2
Marchenko I.
Bachinger M.
3-67-6106-4
Gabashvili T.
Miedler L.
6-47-63
Gojo B.
Kavcic B.
6-34-67-64
Mukund S.
De Greef A.
6-757-637-62
Viola M.
Zapata Miralles B.
6-36-4
Reboul F.
Baldi F.
6-47-5
Janowicz J.
Kolar Z.
6-47-5