Tamara Zidansek vs Kaja Juvan — Acapulco Round of 16

Acapulco · WTA · Round of 16
Tamara Zidansek
SLO
Tamara Zidansek
#148WTA
1655ELO
1581Hard ELO
28 yrs · 168 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLLWLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 24 February 2020
hard
Kaja Juvan
SLO
Kaja Juvan
#140WTA
1696ELO
1637Hard ELO
25 yrs · 170 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLWWLLW
Zidansek T.
6-2 6-2
Juvan K.
Zidansek T.
662
Juvan K.
220

Tamara Zidansek defeated Kaja Juvan 6-2 6-2 in the Acapulco round of 16 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Kaja Juvan came in ranked #140, leading the head-to-head 1–0. Tamara Zidansek claimed a first win over Kaja Juvan in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2021-09-13PortorozQFhardKaja Juvan7-6(4) 6-3

Serve vs return

This season
Zidansek T.serving67% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Juvan K.

Juvan K.serving69% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Zidansek T.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Zidansek T.Juvan K.
1st serve in·Even
63%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
61%
64%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
44%
49%
Service points won·Even
55%
58%
Return points won·Even
46%
44%
Break points saved·Even
54%
54%
Aces / match·Slight edge
1.4
2.1
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.7
2.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 198). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Zidansek T.Juvan K.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
63
58
Break points saved·Clear edge
39
56
Break points won·Even
91
95
Deciding sets·Even
85
83
Tiebreaks·Dominant
95
33

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Zidansek T.Juvan K.
Freshness·
100
—

Zidansek T.: 20 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Watson H.[7]
Fernandez L.
6-46-786-1
Semi-finals
Fernandez L.
Zarazua R.
6-36-3
Watson H.[7]
Wang X.
6-47-66
Quarter-finals
Wang X.
Zhu L.[6]
6-26-2
Zarazua R.
Zidansek T.
6-23-66-2
Fernandez L.
Potapova A.
6-37-5
Watson H.[7]
Mchale C.
6-31-66-1
R16
Wang X.
Errani S.
7-56-736-1
Zarazua R.
Volynets K.
4-67-56-0
Zhu L.[6]
Boulter K.
7-627-5
Mchale C.
Dolehide C.
5-76-46-3
Zidansek T.
Juvan K.
6-26-2
Fernandez L.
Hibino N.[8]
6-36-0
Watson H.[7]
Bondarenko K.
7-626-2
Potapova A.
Maria T.
6-36-3
R32
Zhu L.[6]
Zavatska K.
7-626-2
Volynets K.
Rogers S.
6-27-65
Zidansek T.
Kalinskaya A.
6-36-4
Juvan K.
Williams V.[5]
4-67-646-2
Errani S.
Sorribes Tormo S.
7-56-4
Watson H.[7]
Vandeweghe C.
4-66-46-4
Hibino N.[8]
Rus A.
6-36-1
Potapova A.
Schmiedlova A.
4-67-56-1
Wang X.
Wang Y.[2]
6-47-68
Zarazua R.
Stephens S.[1]
6-46-2
Maria T.
Bouzkova M.[3]
6-41-66-2
Bondarenko K.
Kovinic D.
6-776-46-2
Mchale C.
Davis L.[4]
6-21-66-4
Boulter K.
Di Lorenzo F.
2-66-36-2
Dolehide C.
Arconada U.
6-26-2
Fernandez L.
Stojanovic N.
6-46-1