Quentin Halys vs Matteo Viola — Pau CH Round of 32

Pau CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Quentin Halys
FRA12
Quentin Halys
#90ATP
1707ELO
1677Hard ELO
$694kYTD
$5.4MCAREER
29 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLLWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 24 February 2020
hard
ITA
Matteo Viola
39 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLLLLL
Halys Q.
6-1 6-2
Viola M.
Halys Q.
662
Viola M.
120

Quentin Halys defeated Matteo Viola 6-1 6-2 in the Pau CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Halys Q.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Viola M.

Viola M.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Halys Q.

Serve advantage — Halys Q.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Halys Q.Viola M.
39
Serve
—
26
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Halys Q.Viola M.
1st serve in·Slight edge
58%
65%
1st serve points won·Clear edge
79%
63%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
47%
Service points won·Slight edge
67%
57%
Return points won·Slight edge
34%
40%
Break points saved·Slight edge
65%
55%
Aces / match·Dominant
11.1
1.6
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.9
3.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 94). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Halys Q.Viola M.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
57
8
Break points saved·Dominant
97
20
Break points won·Clear edge
4
25
Deciding sets·Dominant
75
15
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
91
70

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Halys Q.Viola M.
Freshness·
93
—

Halys Q.: 12 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Gulbis E.
Janowicz J.
6-36-4
Semi-finals
Janowicz J.
Vesely J.[1]
6-46-767-67
Gulbis E.
Gabashvili T.
6-36-746-1
Quarter-finals
Gabashvili T.
Bonzi B.
6-42-67-64
Vesely J.[1]
Mayot H.
7-637-65
Gulbis E.
Halys Q.[12]
6-726-46-2
Janowicz J.
Grenier H.
6-36-3
R16
Grenier H.
Couacaud E.[16]
7-647-64
Vesely J.[1]
Lestienne C.[13]
6-47-61
Mayot H.
Gaston H.
6-10-0
Gulbis E.
Molcan A.
6-16-736-4
Halys Q.[12]
Lacko L.[8]
7-626-2
Bonzi B.
Kotov P.
6-46-0
Gabashvili T.
Marchenko I.
6-45-77-5
Janowicz J.
Giustino L.[7]
6-46-756-3
R32
Gabashvili T.
Stakhovsky S.[6]
7-616-2
Halys Q.[12]
Viola M.
6-16-2
Gulbis E.
Gombos N.[2]
7-677-61
Giustino L.[7]
Gojo B.
7-667-64
Mayot H.
Haase R.[9]
7-657-63
Molcan A.
Van De Zandschulp B.[15]
7-654-67-5
Lacko L.[8]
Mukund S.
6-47-63
Kotov P.
Hoang A.[4]
6-45-76-2
Bonzi B.
Benchetrit E.[14]
7-56-3
Marchenko I.
Trungelliti M.[11]
2-67-56-1
Couacaud E.[16]
Moraing M.
6-36-4
Grenier H.
Nagal S.[3]
6-12-66-3
Gaston H.
Maden Y.[5]
1-66-46-4
Vesely J.[1]
Bourgue M.
6-46-796-3
Lestienne C.[13]
Reboul F.
7-56-3
Janowicz J.
Janvier M.[10]
6-46-4
R64
Moraing M.
Wu T.
6-06-0
Grenier H.
Karlovskiy E.
6-37-64
Gaston H.
Karatsev A.
6-31-66-1
Mayot H.
Roumane R.
6-16-1
Bourgue M.
Vavassori A.
7-656-3
Gulbis E.
Borg L.
6-26-3
Molcan A.
Moriya H.
6-26-736-4
Kotov P.
Lamasine T.
2-67-676-4
Bonzi B.
Tseng C.
6-36-2
Marchenko I.
Bachinger M.
3-67-6106-4
Gabashvili T.
Miedler L.
6-47-63
Gojo B.
Kavcic B.
6-34-67-64
Mukund S.
De Greef A.
6-757-637-62
Viola M.
Zapata Miralles B.
6-36-4
Reboul F.
Baldi F.
6-47-5
Janowicz J.
Kolar Z.
6-47-5