Federico Delbonis vs Salvatore Caruso — Santiago Round of 16

Santiago · ATP · Round of 16
ARG7
Federico Delbonis
35 yrs · 193 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLLLLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 24 February 2020
clay
ITA
Salvatore Caruso
33 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWLWLWL
Delbonis F.
7-6 6-3
Caruso S.
Delbonis F.
7762
Caruso S.
6130

Federico Delbonis defeated Salvatore Caruso 7-6 6-3 in the Santiago round of 16 on clay. The result followed the form book — Federico Delbonis came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Federico Delbonis extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2020-01-13AdelaideQ2hardFederico Delbonis7-6(4) 7-6(7)

Serve vs return

This season
Delbonis F.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Caruso S.

Caruso S.serving66% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Delbonis F.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Delbonis F.Caruso S.
1st serve in·Even
64%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
50%
Service points won·Even
61%
59%
Return points won·Even
39%
39%
Break points saved·Even
59%
57%
Aces / match·Even
3.2
2.7
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.4
2.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (177 vs 194). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Delbonis F.Caruso S.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
67
41
Break points saved·Dominant
92
65
Break points won·Clear edge
51
30
Deciding sets·Slight edge
75
80
Tiebreaks·Dominant
76
18

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Weather
22°CClear
Wind 11 km/hHumidity 44%
Final
Seyboth Wild T.
Ruud C.[2]
7-54-66-3
Semi-finals
Seyboth Wild T.
Olivo R.
6-16-3
Ruud C.[2]
Ramos A.[3]
7-656-2
Quarter-finals
Olivo R.
Dellien H.[6]
3-67-657-5
Ramos A.[3]
Monteiro T.[8]
6-46-4
Ruud C.[2]
Delbonis F.[7]
7-57-5
Seyboth Wild T.
Garin C.[1]
7-610-0
R16
Garin C.[1]
Davidovich Fokina A.
6-20-67-64
Seyboth Wild T.
Londero J.[5]
7-676-4
Olivo R.
Cuevas P.[4]
5-77-657-68
Dellien H.[6]
Barrios Vera T.
6-37-62
Monteiro T.[8]
Carballes Baena R.
6-16-4
Delbonis F.[7]
Caruso S.
7-616-3
Ramos A.[3]
Varillas J.
7-636-2
Ruud C.[2]
Tabilo A.
6-47-5
R32
Monteiro T.[8]
Mayer L.
6-706-36-4
Varillas J.
Horansky F.
6-46-2
Delbonis F.[7]
Klizan M.
6-17-65
Caruso S.
Kovalik J.
6-26-3
Tabilo A.
Lorenzi P.
6-36-4
Seyboth Wild T.
Bagnis F.
6-13-66-1
Davidovich Fokina A.
Martin A.
2-67-656-3
Londero J.[5]
Coria F.
6-46-2
Olivo R.
Sousa P.
4-66-36-4
Barrios Vera T.
Taberner C.
4-66-46-2
Dellien H.[6]
Cecchinato M.
6-31-66-3
Carballes Baena R.
Munar J.
6-44-66-4