Matija Pecotic vs Ulises Blanch — Columbus CH Round of 64

Columbus CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 64
CRO
Matija Pecotic
#1882ATP
37 yrs · 185 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWWWLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 24 February 2020
hard
USA
Ulises Blanch
#1661ATP
28 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLWWWW
Pecotic M.
7-6 6-3
Blanch U.
Pecotic M.
7762
Blanch U.
6430

Matija Pecotic defeated Ulises Blanch 7-6 6-3 in the Columbus CH round of 64 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Ulises Blanch came in ranked #1661, defending last year's round of 64.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Pecotic M.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Blanch U.

Blanch U.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Pecotic M.

Serve advantage — Pecotic M.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Pecotic M.Blanch U.
1st serve in·Even
61%
58%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
66%
74%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
50%
Service points won·Even
61%
64%
Return points won·Slight edge
41%
35%
Break points saved·Slight edge
56%
63%
Aces / match·Dominant
2.8
6.9
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.5
3.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (58 vs 181). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Pecotic M.Blanch U.
Clutch Rating·Even
19
19
Break points saved·Dominant
45
83
Break points won·Clear edge
26
2
Deciding sets·Clear edge
40
19
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
30
37

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Wolf J.[6]
Istomin D.[5]
6-46-2
Semi-finals
Wolf J.[6]
Torpegaard M.[8]
7-627-65
Istomin D.[5]
Rodionov J.[13]
6-37-61
Quarter-finals
Rodionov J.[13]
Uchida K.
7-657-63
Wolf J.[6]
Stebe C.[3]
5-77-646-3
Istomin D.[5]
Vukic A.[16]
6-36-2
Torpegaard M.[8]
Polmans M.[2]
7-57-62
R16
Rodionov J.[13]
Oconnell C.[1]
6-747-656-2
Polmans M.[2]
Nam J.[15]
6-37-5
Torpegaard M.[8]
Li Z.
7-624-66-4
Vukic A.[16]
Gomez E.[4]
7-643-67-66
Uchida K.
Kirchheimer S.
6-41-67-64
Wolf J.[6]
Quiroz R.
6-24-66-2
Stebe C.[3]
Haerteis J.
6-46-1
Istomin D.[5]
Clezar G.
6-36-1
R32
Uchida K.
Sela D.[7]
7-51-0
Li Z.
Ramanathan R.[9]
7-677-63
Polmans M.[2]
Kovacevic A.
7-666-4
Nam J.[15]
Glasspool L.
6-36-2
Stebe C.[3]
Pecotic M.
6-47-67
Haerteis J.
Ficovich J.[14]
6-27-65
Wolf J.[6]
Ward J.
6-756-36-4
Clezar G.
Kubler J.[12]
2-67-616-4
Vukic A.[16]
Escoffier A.
6-37-66
Gomez E.[4]
Rodriguez R.
6-46-0
Kirchheimer S.
Polansky P.[10]
4-66-17-65
Oconnell C.[1]
Bangoura S.
6-46-2
Istomin D.[5]
Cozbinov A.
6-26-2
Torpegaard M.[8]
King K.
6-756-46-4
Rodionov J.[13]
Hidalgo D.
4-66-46-4
Quiroz R.
Harris A.[11]
7-654-66-1
R64
King K.
Gomez Herrera C.
6-36-3
Li Z.
Young D.
7-57-66
Pecotic M.
Blanch U.
7-646-3
Ward J.
Arconada J.
6-37-66
Cozbinov A.
Castelnuovo L.
6-36-2
Rodriguez R.
Hardt N.
2-66-36-0
Uchida K.
Song E.
6-33-67-62
Bangoura S.
Rapp A.
6-36-3
Quiroz R.
Mcnally J.
7-637-65
Escoffier A.
Redlicki M.
7-646-3
Glasspool L.
Kingsley C.
7-636-3
Clezar G.
Boulais J.
6-46-2
Hidalgo D.
Ortega Olmedo R.
7-656-2
Kovacevic A.
Roelofse R.
6-16-777-66
Kirchheimer S.
Hernandez J.
4-66-26-3
Haerteis J.
Brown A.
6-37-65