Thiago Seyboth Wild vs Facundo Bagnis — Santiago Round of 32

Santiago · ATP · Round of 32
Thiago Seyboth Wild
BRA
Thiago Seyboth Wild
#284ATP
1532ELO
1516Clay ELO
26 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWWWLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 24 February 2020
clay
ARG
Facundo Bagnis
#431ATP
1591ELO
1584Clay ELO
36 yrs · 183 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLWWWL
Seyboth Wild T.
6-1 3-6 6-1
Bagnis F.
Seyboth Wild T.
6362
Bagnis F.
1611

Thiago Seyboth Wild defeated Facundo Bagnis 6-1 3-6 6-1 in the Santiago round of 32 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Seyboth Wild T.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Bagnis F.

Bagnis F.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Seyboth Wild T.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Seyboth Wild T.Bagnis F.
1st serve in·Even
63%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
51%
Service points won·Even
64%
63%
Return points won·Even
38%
40%
Break points saved·Even
64%
62%
Aces / match·Even
4.9
4.5
Double faults / match·Even
2.8
2.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 198). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Seyboth Wild T.Bagnis F.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
27
54
Break points saved·Even
93
92
Break points won·Slight edge
25
35
Deciding sets·Dominant
20
89
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
16
3

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Seyboth Wild T.Bagnis F.
Freshness·
90
—

Seyboth Wild T.: 7 days rest · 1 match, 19 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Weather
22°CClear
Wind 11 km/hHumidity 44%
Final
Seyboth Wild T.
Ruud C.[2]
7-54-66-3
Semi-finals
Seyboth Wild T.
Olivo R.
6-16-3
Ruud C.[2]
Ramos A.[3]
7-656-2
Quarter-finals
Olivo R.
Dellien H.[6]
3-67-657-5
Ramos A.[3]
Monteiro T.[8]
6-46-4
Ruud C.[2]
Delbonis F.[7]
7-57-5
Seyboth Wild T.
Garin C.[1]
7-610-0
R16
Garin C.[1]
Davidovich Fokina A.
6-20-67-64
Seyboth Wild T.
Londero J.[5]
7-676-4
Olivo R.
Cuevas P.[4]
5-77-657-68
Dellien H.[6]
Barrios Vera T.
6-37-62
Monteiro T.[8]
Carballes Baena R.
6-16-4
Delbonis F.[7]
Caruso S.
7-616-3
Ramos A.[3]
Varillas J.
7-636-2
Ruud C.[2]
Tabilo A.
6-47-5
R32
Monteiro T.[8]
Mayer L.
6-706-36-4
Varillas J.
Horansky F.
6-46-2
Delbonis F.[7]
Klizan M.
6-17-65
Caruso S.
Kovalik J.
6-26-3
Tabilo A.
Lorenzi P.
6-36-4
Seyboth Wild T.
Bagnis F.
6-13-66-1
Davidovich Fokina A.
Martin A.
2-67-656-3
Londero J.[5]
Coria F.
6-46-2
Olivo R.
Sousa P.
4-66-36-4
Barrios Vera T.
Taberner C.
4-66-46-2
Dellien H.[6]
Cecchinato M.
6-31-66-3
Carballes Baena R.
Munar J.
6-44-66-4