Christopher Oconnell vs Sebastian Korda — Drummondville CH Quarter-final

Drummondville CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
AUS3
Christopher Oconnell
1673ELO
1657Hard ELO
32 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 17 February 2020
hard
Sebastian Korda
USA11
Sebastian Korda
#63ATP
1809ELO
1765Hard ELO
$471kYTD
$9.0MCAREER
26 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWWWWWW
Oconnell C.
6-3 6-4
Korda S.
Oconnell C.
662
Korda S.
340

Christopher Oconnell defeated Sebastian Korda 6-3 6-4 in the Drummondville CH quarter-final on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Sebastian Korda came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Christopher Oconnell claimed a first win over Sebastian Korda in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2024-01-08AdelaideQFhardSebastian Korda6-4 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Oconnell C.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Korda S.

Korda S.serving90% hold

wins 70% of points on serve vs Oconnell C.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Oconnell C.Korda S.
20
Serve
61
32
Return
58

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Oconnell C.Korda S.
1st serve in·Even
61%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
73%
74%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
52%
Service points won·Even
64%
66%
Return points won·Even
35%
37%
Break points saved·Even
63%
61%
Aces / match·Slight edge
7.1
8.1
Double faults / match·Slight edge
1.7
2.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 198). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Oconnell C.Korda S.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
49
87
Break points saved·Even
98
98
Break points won·Dominant
22
73
Deciding sets·Dominant
38
96
Tiebreaks·Even
93
94

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Cressy M.[14]
Rinderknech A.[12]
6-746-46-4
Semi-finals
Rinderknech A.[12]
Oconnell C.[3]
6-46-2
Cressy M.[14]
Haerteis J.
7-626-4
Quarter-finals
Cressy M.[14]
Kamke T.[10]
6-46-3
Oconnell C.[3]
Korda S.[11]
6-36-4
Rinderknech A.[12]
Watanuki Y.[15]
6-26-4
Haerteis J.
Cid R.[8]
1-66-46-1
R16
Cid R.[8]
Broady L.[9]
6-46-1
Kamke T.[10]
Harris A.[5]
6-37-62
Korda S.[11]
Purcell M.[7]
6-756-16-0
Rinderknech A.[12]
Mmoh M.[6]
6-23-66-3
Watanuki Y.[15]
Koepfer D.[1]
6-36-1
Cressy M.[14]
Caruana L.
6-26-1
Oconnell C.[3]
Nam J.[13]
6-14-66-4
Haerteis J.
Niklas Salminen P.
7-655-77-5
R32
Cid R.[8]
Gomez Gb42 A.
6-06-2
Niklas Salminen P.
Soeda G.[2]
7-656-4
Haerteis J.
Oliveira G.[16]
7-656-1
Broady L.[9]
Kirkov V.
3-66-36-4
Kamke T.[10]
Imai S.
6-31-66-3
Purcell M.[7]
Peniston R.
6-26-4
Nam J.[13]
Song E.
6-26-1
Oconnell C.[3]
Escoffier A.
6-36-4
Mmoh M.[6]
Guinard M.
6-23-66-4
Rinderknech A.[12]
Rodriguez R.
6-47-5
Watanuki Y.[15]
Blancaneaux G.
6-25-77-64
Koepfer D.[1]
Kirchheimer S.
7-54-66-3
Harris A.[5]
Catarina L.
3-66-46-1
Caruana L.
Schnur B.[4]
7-616-4
Cressy M.[14]
Baadi T.
6-16-2
Korda S.[11]
Simon T.
6-34-67-66
R64
Baadi T.
Volfson D.
6-35-76-4
Guinard M.
Sarmiento R.
7-6102-63-2
Niklas Salminen P.
Uchida K.
6-16-747-5
Gomez Gb42 A.
Corwin F.
4-66-36-2
Caruana L.
Takahashi Y.
7-56-3
Imai S.
Redlicki M.
7-616-3
Catarina L.
Gervais W.
6-16-2
Peniston R.
Chappell N.
6-26-4
Song E.
Arias B.
6-26-1
Rodriguez R.
Tiraspolsky I.
7-606-756-0
Blancaneaux G.
Damov K.
6-06-1
Kirchheimer S.
Peliwo F.
6-36-4
Escoffier A.
Galarneau A.
2-66-26-1
Haerteis J.
Bourcet T.
6-26-0
Kirkov V.
Glasspool L.
7-613-66-0
Simon T.
Baiant R.
6-26-2