Illya Marchenko vs Hugo Gaston — Bergamo CH Semi-final

Bergamo CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
UKR
Illya Marchenko
#1740ATP
38 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLLLLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 17 February 2020
hard
Hugo Gaston
FRA15
Hugo Gaston
#107ATP
1622ELO
1628Hard ELO
$355kYTD
$4.0MCAREER
25 yrs · 173 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLWWWL
Marchenko I.
4-6 6-4 6-4
Gaston H.
Marchenko I.
4662
Gaston H.
6441

Illya Marchenko defeated Hugo Gaston 4-6 6-4 6-4 in the Bergamo CH semi-final on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Hugo Gaston came in ranked #107.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Marchenko I.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Gaston H.

Gaston H.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Marchenko I.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Marchenko I.Gaston H.
1st serve in·Even
56%
55%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
73%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
50%
Service points won·Even
63%
60%
Return points won·Even
37%
39%
Break points saved·Even
61%
59%
Aces / match·Clear edge
5.5
2.9
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.5
2.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Marchenko I.Gaston H.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
13
74
Break points saved·Slight edge
80
91
Break points won·Dominant
7
57
Deciding sets·Dominant
14
78
Tiebreaks·Dominant
10
93

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Marchenko I.Gaston H.
Freshness·
—
51

Gaston H.: 2 days rest · 5 matches, 128 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Semi-finals
Marchenko I.
Gaston H.[15]
4-66-46-4
Couacaud E.[7]
Tseng C.
4-66-37-65
Quarter-finals
Marchenko I.
Crepatte B.
6-757-636-0
Couacaud E.[7]
Marcora R.[2]
7-646-3
Tseng C.
Arnaboldi A.
6-46-4
Gaston H.[15]
Ilkel C.[5]
6-46-4
R16
Marchenko I.
Safiullin R.[12]
7-50-0
Marcora R.[2]
Krstin P.[13]
6-26-3
Tseng C.
Baldi F.[16]
6-46-2
Couacaud E.[7]
Vanni L.
6-36-2
Arnaboldi A.
Kolar Z.[11]
6-36-4
Crepatte B.
Michalski D.
2-66-46-3
Ilkel C.[5]
Brancaccio R.
6-17-62
Gaston H.[15]
Giustino L.[1]
6-33-66-4
R32
Crepatte B.
Ferreira Silva F.[3]
6-36-4
Safiullin R.[12]
Doumbia S.
5-4
Michalski D.
Bourgue M.[14]
6-42-0
Arnaboldi A.
Lestienne C.[6]
2-66-26-3
Marcora R.[2]
Zeppieri G.
7-56-2
Gaston H.[15]
Grenier H.
6-36-0
Couacaud E.[7]
Galovic V.
6-26-4
Krstin P.[13]
De Greef A.
6-26-4
Vanni L.
Lamasine T.[10]
6-36-4
Tseng C.
Trungelliti M.[4]
7-646-3
Baldi F.[16]
Nejedly P.
6-36-3
Kolar Z.[11]
Vavassori A.
7-622-66-4
Marchenko I.
Moriya H.[8]
6-16-4
Ilkel C.[5]
Durasovic V.
6-36-4
Brancaccio R.
Viola M.[9]
6-46-4
Giustino L.[1]
Serdarusic N.
6-7106-37-67
R64
Zeppieri G.
Cobolli F.
6-33-67-69
De Greef A.
Gigante M.
6-767-637-5
Galovic V.
Jecan M.
6-16-2
Nejedly P.
Ocleppo J.
6-26-4
Vavassori A.
Molcan A.
7-616-757-5
Arnaboldi A.
Klein L.
7-646-4
Marchenko I.
Pellegrino A.
6-43-66-1
Doumbia S.
Fatic N.
6-47-64
Tseng C.
Borg L.
6-36-1
Brancaccio R.
Celikbilek A.
3-66-06-1
Vanni L.
Ornago F.
6-16-2
Michalski D.
Maestrelli F.
6-24-66-2
Crepatte B.
Musetti L.
6-36-2
Durasovic V.
Nardi L.
7-56-3
Grenier H.
Pecotic M.
7-56-3
Serdarusic N.
Gakhov I.
6-37-5