Hugo Gaston vs Cem Ilkel — Bergamo CH Quarter-final

Bergamo CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Hugo Gaston
FRA15
Hugo Gaston
#107ATP
1622ELO
1628Hard ELO
$355kYTD
$4.0MCAREER
25 yrs · 173 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLWWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 17 February 2020
hard
Cem Ilkel
TUR5
Cem Ilkel
#1462ATP
30 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLLWL
Gaston H.
6-4 6-4
Ilkel C.
Gaston H.
662
Ilkel C.
440

Hugo Gaston defeated Cem Ilkel 6-4 6-4 in the Bergamo CH quarter-final on hard. The result followed the form book — Hugo Gaston came in ranked #107.

Key context

  • Match story: Hugo Gaston edged a tight contest from start to finish — 6–4 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Gaston H.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Ilkel C.

Ilkel C.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Gaston H.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Gaston H.Ilkel C.
1st serve in·Even
55%
58%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
50%
Service points won·Even
60%
62%
Return points won·Even
39%
37%
Break points saved·Even
59%
57%
Aces / match·Clear edge
2.9
4.7
Double faults / match·Even
2.2
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Gaston H.Ilkel C.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
74
32
Break points saved·Dominant
91
49
Break points won·Dominant
57
3
Deciding sets·Slight edge
78
70
Tiebreaks·Dominant
93
66

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Gaston H.Ilkel C.
Freshness·
51
—

Gaston H.: 2 days rest · 5 matches, 128 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Semi-finals
Marchenko I.
Gaston H.[15]
4-66-46-4
Couacaud E.[7]
Tseng C.
4-66-37-65
Quarter-finals
Marchenko I.
Crepatte B.
6-757-636-0
Couacaud E.[7]
Marcora R.[2]
7-646-3
Tseng C.
Arnaboldi A.
6-46-4
Gaston H.[15]
Ilkel C.[5]
6-46-4
R16
Marchenko I.
Safiullin R.[12]
7-50-0
Marcora R.[2]
Krstin P.[13]
6-26-3
Tseng C.
Baldi F.[16]
6-46-2
Couacaud E.[7]
Vanni L.
6-36-2
Arnaboldi A.
Kolar Z.[11]
6-36-4
Crepatte B.
Michalski D.
2-66-46-3
Ilkel C.[5]
Brancaccio R.
6-17-62
Gaston H.[15]
Giustino L.[1]
6-33-66-4
R32
Crepatte B.
Ferreira Silva F.[3]
6-36-4
Safiullin R.[12]
Doumbia S.
5-4
Michalski D.
Bourgue M.[14]
6-42-0
Arnaboldi A.
Lestienne C.[6]
2-66-26-3
Marcora R.[2]
Zeppieri G.
7-56-2
Gaston H.[15]
Grenier H.
6-36-0
Couacaud E.[7]
Galovic V.
6-26-4
Krstin P.[13]
De Greef A.
6-26-4
Vanni L.
Lamasine T.[10]
6-36-4
Tseng C.
Trungelliti M.[4]
7-646-3
Baldi F.[16]
Nejedly P.
6-36-3
Kolar Z.[11]
Vavassori A.
7-622-66-4
Marchenko I.
Moriya H.[8]
6-16-4
Ilkel C.[5]
Durasovic V.
6-36-4
Brancaccio R.
Viola M.[9]
6-46-4
Giustino L.[1]
Serdarusic N.
6-7106-37-67
R64
Zeppieri G.
Cobolli F.
6-33-67-69
De Greef A.
Gigante M.
6-767-637-5
Galovic V.
Jecan M.
6-16-2
Nejedly P.
Ocleppo J.
6-26-4
Vavassori A.
Molcan A.
7-616-757-5
Arnaboldi A.
Klein L.
7-646-4
Marchenko I.
Pellegrino A.
6-43-66-1
Doumbia S.
Fatic N.
6-47-64
Tseng C.
Borg L.
6-36-1
Brancaccio R.
Celikbilek A.
3-66-06-1
Vanni L.
Ornago F.
6-16-2
Michalski D.
Maestrelli F.
6-24-66-2
Crepatte B.
Musetti L.
6-36-2
Durasovic V.
Nardi L.
7-56-3
Grenier H.
Pecotic M.
7-56-3
Serdarusic N.
Gakhov I.
6-37-5