Tomas Machac vs Teymuraz Gabashvili — Koblenz CH Round of 32

Koblenz CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Tomas Machac
CZE
Tomas Machac
#53ATP
1866ELO
1829Hard ELO
$832kYTD
$6.8MCAREER
25 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWWLWW
0 — 0
Sets
Monday, 17 February 2020
hard
RUS
Teymuraz Gabashvili
41 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWWLLWL
Machac T.
6-0 6-3
Gabashvili T.
Machac T.
662
Gabashvili T.
03–

Tomas Machac defeated Teymuraz Gabashvili 6-0 6-3 in the Koblenz CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Machac T.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Gabashvili T.

Gabashvili T.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Machac T.

Serve advantage — Machac T.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Machac T.Gabashvili T.
30
Serve
—
25
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Machac T.Gabashvili T.
1st serve in·Even
62%
58%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
68%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
54%
45%
Service points won·Slight edge
64%
59%
Return points won·Even
38%
37%
Break points saved·Slight edge
62%
55%
Aces / match·Clear edge
5.0
3.3
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.5
5.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 76). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Machac T.Gabashvili T.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
90
11
Break points saved·Dominant
98
56
Break points won·Dominant
80
11
Deciding sets·Dominant
94
23
Tiebreaks·Dominant
97
24

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Machac T.
Van De Zandschulp B.
6-34-66-3
Semi-finals
Van De Zandschulp B.
Kuhn N.
6-43-66-2
Machac T.
Bemelmans R.
6-26-4
Quarter-finals
Bemelmans R.
Hanfmann Y.
6-36-2
Kuhn N.
Masur D.
5-77-626-2
Van De Zandschulp B.
Maden Y.
4-66-46-4
Machac T.
Kuzmanov D.
6-46-4
R16
Hanfmann Y.
Mukund S.
7-56-4
Bemelmans R.
Halys Q.
6-26-4
Machac T.
Kopriva V.
6-36-3
Maden Y.
Kirkin E.
6-36-0
Kuzmanov D.
Brown D.
4-66-36-4
Kuhn N.
Basic M.
6-47-64
Masur D.
Griekspoor T.
5-76-36-1
Van De Zandschulp B.
Marterer M.
6-46-2
R32
Van De Zandschulp B.
Sijsling I.
W/O
Masur D.
Safranek V.
5-77-626-2
Griekspoor T.
Gerch L.
6-42-67-63
Machac T.
Gabashvili T.
6-06-3
Halys Q.
Aubriot A.
7-56-2
Kopriva V.
Otte O.
6-47-64
Brown D.
Ignatik U.
6-46-4
Kuzmanov D.
Janvier M.
6-47-5
Marterer M.
Lenz J.
6-16-3
Kuhn N.
Bega A.
6-36-2
Basic M.
Moraing M.
6-46-4
Maden Y.
Wessels L.
3-67-656-3
Kirkin E.
Kotov P.
6-46-757-5
Bemelmans R.
Dubrivnyy A.
6-36-1
Mukund S.
Miedler L.
7-616-4
Hanfmann Y.
Vrbensky M.
6-776-47-65
R64
Basic M.
Mertens Y.
6-36-1
Bega A.
Leshem E.
6-16-2
Vrbensky M.
Eriksson M.
6-26-2
Mukund S.
Jianu F.
6-36-2
Dubrivnyy A.
Added D.
7-56-4
Aubriot A.
Pavlasek A.
6-14-66-4
Kopriva V.
Gengel M.
6-46-3
Machac T.
Zima L.
6-26-2
Ignatik U.
Ehrenschneider N.
6-16-1
Kuzmanov D.
Orlov V.
6-26-1
Safranek V.
Heyman C.
6-46-2
Gerch L.
Dalla Valle E.
6-16-4
Wessels L.
Heller P.
6-36-2
Kirkin E.
Hassan B.
4-66-16-4
Marterer M.
Struvay E.
6-37-65
Sijsling I.
Zuk K.
4-66-37-64